Was Homeland Security Created To Protect Those Who Deceived America?

By Jeff Gates
11-13-9

Janet Napolitano, Secretary Homeland Security is greeted on Capitol Hill by Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. Joseph Lieberman. Was Fort Hood really the target of a terrorist attack? The first clue to the real culprit emerged when Senator Joe Lieberman sought to blame this mass murder on the U.S. military. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security, he promised hearings on how the Pentagon protects its personnel from domestic terrorists. Will Lieberman, an avowed Zionist, use this incident to insist that the U.S. do more to protect Jewish nationalists? More importantly, what do his concerns mean for homeland security? Joe Lieberman has an ally in Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security. In April, this former Arizona governor warned about potential terrorism from U.S. troops returning from deployment in the Middle East. Though roundly attacked, she defended her position, calling it an “assessment not an accusation.” When Army Major Nidal Hasan killed U.S. troops on the nation’s largest military base, was this evidence of “militant Islam”? Or did this military psychiatrist snap under pressure while treating returning vets on a base averaging ten suicides a month? Is there an undisclosed agenda behind those seeking to portray this act as the work of “Islamo fascists”? To answer these questions requires a grasp of how “assets” are deployed by those skilled at waging war by way of deception. An asset is someone who has been profiled in sufficient depth that-when placed in a pre-staged time, place and circumstance-the person can be relied on to behave consistent with their profile. Best Story Wins Since the end of the Cold War, the predominant geopolitical narrative has been The Clash of Civilizations and its military counterpart: The Global War on Terrorism. How better to advance that storyline than to kill American soldiers even before they leave the U.S.? What’s the motive? Imagine if the intelligence that induced the U.S. to war was proven “fixed” around a preset goal. What if the common source of that treachery is poised to become transparent? If you were complicit in this deception (an act of treason), how would you obscure those facts? How would you sustain a “Muslim terrorist” narrative once the intelligence “facts” are exposed as pre-staged fictions meant to advance an undisclosed Israeli agenda? For those marketing The Clash premise, Dr. Hasan’s psychotic break was a blessing. At Family Security Matters, President Carol Taber describes this incident as “the Ft. Hood terrorist attack” by an “Islamist gunman.” Editor Pam Meister promotes “the shocking TRUTH (sic) behind these attacks so that we might ward off those yet to come.” Executive Vice-President Linda Cohen, who also serves as a trustee of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), offers advice certain to appeal to Lieberman and Napolitano: “No one is safe now. Not you, not the military, not your children, not office workers nor subway riders, nor anyone who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.” Is there a precedent for combining aberrant behavior and a mass murder to advance a preset agenda? Do you recall the sniper attacks around Washington, D.C. in October 2002? Those murders commenced one day before debate began on Senate Resolution 46 proposed by Joe Lieberman to authorize the use of U.S. forces in Iraq. In the immediate aftermath of 9-11, Lieberman and Arizona Senator John McCain urged that the U.S. target not Al Qaeda but Iraq. The nation’s capital became a city under siege when those attacks created insecurity and heightened anxiety as serial murders left ten dead and three wounded over a 10-day period. Those random shootings transformed the terror of 9-11 into a personal reality for Washington residents while Lieberman deployed phony intelligence to promote the invasion of a nation that had no hand in the mass murder of 9-11. Assets and Sayanim Once again: assets are profiled personalities catalyzed to act out known dysfunctions in ways that are advantageous based on the time, place and circumstances of their behavior. The totality of the facts suggests that Dr. Nidal Hasan may well have been such an asset. Assets are typically identified, profiled and developed over lengthy periods of time. Their potential to act out a known personality disorder is held in reserve in the same way that a military commander holds troops in reserve for deployment at an opportune time. How is an asset developed in plain sight and then tasked at the right moment? Only a careful investigation can identify those influences particular to Dr. Hasan, including what decisions led to his transfer to Ft. Hood and the circumstances there that triggered his behavior. News reports to date are consistent with this analysis. For instance, his name appears as a participant for public briefings at the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University. As a registrant in the Obama presidential transition task force (“Thinking Anew-Security Priorities for the Next Administration”), he would have interacted with a team of nine “task force briefers.” Judging from their surnames, at least seven were Ashkenazim. As a combat-stress psychiatrist, Dr. Hasan dealt daily with troubled vets at Walter Reed Hospital where the most grievously wounded are sent to recover, many of them amputees, disfigured or otherwise handicapped for life. While coping with that vicarious trauma, he was taunted for his Muslim beliefs and harassed for his Middle Eastern heritage even though he was born, raised and educated in the U.S.. Despite clear indications of internal turmoil, including repeated attempts to resign his commission, he was dispatched to a post known for its huge population of combat-stressed vets. He arrived anticipating orders to deploy to Afghanistan, realizing his worst nightmare. Meanwhile a commander-in-chief promising change made matters even worse in the region. Israeli psy-ops rely on an extensive cadre of sayanim (Hebrew for volunteers) who are shielded from legal culpability by being told only enough to perform their narrow role when tasked to assist with operations on an as-needed basis. Otherwise, they gather and report useful intelligence. Thus the presence of sayanim throughout the U.S. government. A sayan may well have identified Nidal Hasan as a potential asset who could be developed and, as here, deployed. At What Cost? With evidence emerging that Israelis and pro-Israelis were the source of the sham intelligence that induced the U.S. to war, those responsible are scrambling to cover their tracks. Americans will soon realize what the facts confirm: Jewish nationalists deceived the U.S. in order to deploy our military to pursue Israel’s expansionist agenda for the Middle East. Americans will soon awaken to the cost of this entangled alliance in blood and treasure. U.S. deaths in Iraq could top 4,300 this month with more than one million Iraqis dead from the war and from violence unleashed by those who manipulated this alliance to induce an invasion. That brings us back to the uncomfortable but essential question: Was Homeland Security created to protect the U.S.? Or was it created to protect those who deceived the U.S.? Was this incident another example of the murderous misdirection deployed to pit Americans against Muslims to advance unacknowledged Zionist goals? By shifting blame to the military, do Lieberman and Napolitano intend to use federal law enforcement to contain the outraged reaction of an informed public and an awakened military? Was Dr. Nidal Hasan a terrorist? Or was he a troubled pawn in an ongoing psy-ops campaign meant to revive a narrative that-like the fixed intelligence-was losing credibility? Both the false intelligence and the anti-Muslim narrative feature a theme of fomenting hate and intolerance. On October 28th, President Obama signed into law ADL’s model hate crime legislation. Will that federal law now be deployed by Homeland Security to silence those who make transparent the common source of this deception? How much longer before a long-deceived public-both in the U.S. and abroad-takes the steps required to ensure that never again is duplicity allowed to operate on such a scale? * Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide; an adviser to policy-makers worldwide; former counsel to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee; and author of numerous articles and books including his latest book “http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/098213150X?ie=UTF8&tag=sabbahsblog-20&link Code=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=098213150X” Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War “http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=sabbahsblog-20&l=as2&o=1&a=098213150X” Democracy at Risk and The Ownership Solution. See “http://www.criminalstate.com” www.criminalstate.com Also see: “http://intifada-palestine.com/2009/07/17/how-the-israel-lobby- took-control-of-u-s-foreign-policy/” How the Israel Lobby Took Control of U.S. Foreign Policy “http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.php?name=News&file= article&sid=9000″ Dancing To Our Israeli Masters Veterans Today “http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2009/11/09/todays-ancient-warfare-facts-vs-beliefs/” “Permalink to Today’s Ancient Warfare: Facts vs. Beliefs” Today’s Ancient Warfare: Facts vs. Beliefs

 

Support for legalizing marijuana grows rapidly around U.S.

By Karl Vick

Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 23, 2009

 

The same day they rejected a gay marriage ballot measure, residents of Maine voted overwhelmingly to allow the sale of medical marijuana over the counter at state-licensed dispensaries.

Later in the month, the American Medical Association reversed a longtime position and urged the federal government to remove marijuana from Schedule One of the Controlled Substances Act, which equates it with heroin.

A few days later, advocates for easing marijuana laws left their biannual strategy conference with plans to press ahead on all fronts — state law, ballot measures, and court — in a movement that for the first time in decades appeared to be gaining ground.

“This issue is breaking out in a remarkably rapid way now,” said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. “Public opinion is changing very, very rapidly.”

The shift is widely described as generational. A Gallup poll in October found 44 percent of Americans favor full legalization of marijuana — a rise of 13 points since 2000. Gallup said that if public support continues growing at a rate of 1 to 2 percent per year, “the majority of Americans could favor legalization of the drug in as little as four years.”

A 53 percent majority already does so in the West, according to the survey. The finding heartens advocates collecting signatures to put the question of legalization before California voters in a 2010 initiative.

At last week’s International Drug Reform Conference, activists gamed specific proposals for taxing and regulating pot along the lines of cigarettes and alcohol, as a bill pending in the California Legislature would do. The measure is not expected to pass, but in urging its serious debate, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) gave credence to a potential revenue source that the state’s tax chief said could raise $1.3 billion in the recession, which advocates describe as a boon.

There were also tips on lobbying state legislatures, where measures decriminalizing possession of small amounts have passed in 14 states. Activists predict half of states will have laws allowing possession for medical purposes in the near future.

Interest in medical marijuana and easing other marijuana laws picked up markedly about 18 months ago, but advocates say the biggest surge came with the election ofBarack Obama, the third straight president to acknowledge having smoked marijuana, and the first to regard it with anything like nonchalance.

“As a kid, I inhaled,” Barack Obama famously said on the campaign. “That was the whole point.”

In office, Obama made good on a promise to halt federal prosecutions of medical marijuana use where permitted by state law. That has recalibrated the federal attitude, which had been consistently hostile to marijuana since the early 1970s, when President Richard Nixon cast aside the recommendations of a presidential commission arguing against lumping pot with hard drugs.

Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said he was astonished recently to be invited to contribute thoughts to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Obama’s drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, was police chief in Seattle, where voters officially made enforcement of marijuana laws the lowest priority.

ADL Blasts ‘Paranoid’ Right

 

(ed. More filth from the ADL.  They would have us believe Glenn Beck and Michael Savage are the leaders of all who question big government and not paid operatives, tasked to discredit honest Americans.  ”The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.” I’m sure the sickos over at the ADL remember who said that.)

Are Millions of Anti-Obama Protestors ‘Conspirators?’

By Rev. Ted Pike
11-23-9

The Anti-Defamation League likes to describe itself as a “civil liberties” watchdog group that is ever alert to warn of dangerous “conspiracy theories,” particularly those that are ‘anti-semitic.’ While deploring the conspiracy theories of others, ADL has produced a 27-page special report entitled “Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies” http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/ which, of course, is a conspiracy theory of its own! It charges that a number of right wing media leaders are conspiring to lie and distort facts in order to incite tens of millions of Americans against Pres. Obama. ADL further alleges that those who receive such disinformation, such as tea party and town hall protesters, are also part of the conspiracy. Trampling truth, ADL says, they follow conspiracy theories that “imagine government plots.” Ignoring reality, ADL says these millions of lesser conspirators will repeat almost anything necessary to “destroy” their opponents and bring down Obama. ADL: “Since the election of Barak Obama as president, a current of anti-government hostility has swept across the United States, creating a climate of fervor and activism with manifestations ranging from incivility in public forums to acts of intimidation and violenceSome of these assertions are motivated by prejudice, but more common is an intense strain of anti-government mistrust and anger, colored by a streak of paranoia and belief in conspiraciesUltimately, this anti-government anger, if it continues to grow in intensity and scope, may result in an increase in anti-government extremists and the potential for a rise in violent anti-government acts.” In reality, Obama has outrageously gone out of his way to offend the values and commonsense of heartland America by promoting a big-spending, socialist, pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, pro-hate law agenda. Obama’s far-left arrogance and excesses and a Democrat Congress which ignores the wishes of their constituents are the real cause of mounting opposition. Here, from top to bottom, are those whom ADL contends are either architects or accomplices of conspiracies motivated by malice and paranoia, which could plunge America into hate-motivated violence. Glenn Beck ADL says, “The most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke the fires of anti-government anger is right wing media host Glenn Beck, who has a TV show on FOX News and a popular syndicated radio showBeck and his guests have made a habit of demonizing Pres. Obama and promoting conspiracy theories about his administration.” “Beck’s key role as a ‘fear-monger-in-chief,’ [involves] using constant laments such as ‘I fear for my country,’ to create a sense of anxiety about and hostility towards the government in his audience.” Regarding the September 12, 2009 Populist rally in Washington, D.C., ADL says Beck “promoted the event. The anger and rage that had been expressed at town hall meetings a few weeks earlier and at Tea Parties across the country became even uglier.” Joseph Farah and WorldNetDaily “WorldNetDaily (WND), published by Joseph Farah,” ADL contends, “is an online newspaper with a far-right wing, political outlook that often blurs the distinction between fact and opinion, or even fact and fiction. The publication has spearheaded efforts to convince the public that Obama does not have a legitimate birth certificate.” ADL says, “One of the main reporters for WND, Jerome Corsi, has been a major promoter of the “birther” conspiracy theory…” that Obama was born outside the US. ADL says Farah took part in the strongly anti-Obama “How to Take Back America” conference in St. Louis, September 25-26. It was heavily promoted by WND and regular columnist and anti-Obama syndicated talk show host Janet Porter. ADL describes in detail how, “Two attorneys, Philip Berg, of Pennsylvania, and Orly Taitz, of California, have been particularly active in spreading the ‘birther’ argument, as hasWND.” Filing lawsuits demanding certainty about Obama’s citizenship, ADL says, are “Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake, 2008 presidential and vice-presidential candidates respectively for the fringe American Independent party.” Alex Jones ADL calls Alex Jones “the Conspiracy King.” It says, “If, in mainstream America, Glenn Beck may be the radio talk show host most involved stirring up anti-government hostility and anger, his counterpart on the extreme fringe is Alex JonesHe hascollaborated with celebrity truthers such as actor Charlie Sheen and far right icon Ron Paul, a US Representative from Texas [who] has often been a guest on his show.” In March 2008, media figure Lou Dobbs was a guest on Jones’ show. “After the election of Obama, Jones began to develop ties to mainstream conservative media outlets such as FOX News Network.” Yet ADL asserts Jones fulfills exactly what it predicts right-wing, anti-Obama hysteria will ultimately lead to: ADL says the April murder in Pittsburgh of three policeman by young Richard Poplawski was under the influence of “Jones and other conspiracy theorists.” Michael Savage ADL: “As these conspiracy theories become more popular, they are starting to cross over from the fringes into more “mainstream” venues. On August 14, 2009, for example, right-wing radio talk show host Michael Savage, whose listeners are estimated to number over eight million, proclaimed on his Savage Nation that the government would declare martial law. “Martial law,” he announced, “will be declared in this country over a pretext. I think the likelihood is very high that the gang that has taken over this country will declarea pretextthe equivalent of the Reichstag fire [an event that helped the Nazis take over the German government]to put in a form of martial law.” Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Twitter ADL complains that these internet giants are making possible “viral” proliferation of grassroots American rage and conspiracy theories by providing them an uncensored forum. Tea Party protests ADL says, “Some conservative media outlets, such as the FOX New Network, have also played a role in promoting tea parties.” “At these events, and later sequels, anti-government sentiments and conspiracy theories proliferated, with a common theme being that somehow Obama had ’stolen’ the country from Americans.” Town hall meetings Town hall meetings, which ADL calls “disruptions,” are described as the rude, unnecessary interruption of political and social progress, particularly healthcare reform, during this past summer. ADL especially objects to frequent imagery comparing Obama and the Democrat proposal of taxpayer-funded abortions to Nazism. “The widespread use of Holocaust and Nazi analogies and comparisons, which still continue, goes well beyond legitimate or even exaggerated criticism of the Obama administration and its policies.” “In these Nazi analogies, Obama and his supporters are being cast as opponents to be destroyed rather than fellow citizens with whom dialogue, debate, and compromise are possible. The ready use of such propaganda is symptomatic of the radicalization of some segments of the American populace, and contributes to a self-perpetuating cycle of radicalization, in which even more extreme ideas seem plausible and acceptable.” Immigration protest ADL describes immigration protesters as “xenophobes” — persons afflicted with an irrational fear of foreigners and those who are different. It is also a movement, ADL claims, which is manipulative. “continuing its exploitation of hot-button issues to gain a greater following, the anti-immigrant movement is increasingly appropriating anti-government language and events.” ADL may particularly resent ALIPAC, the immigration watchdog group which, this spring, alerted the nation to ADL/Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) attempts in their MIAC document to bias Missouri State Police against a wide spectrum of Christian/conservative and patriotic groups, labeling them potential terrorist threats. ADL says of ALIPAC leader William Gheen that he “has a history of using the tea party movement to serve his own purposes.” What Can We Do? The Anti-Defamation League is the most powerful, anti-Christian, pro-homosexual, pro-abortion attack group in America. Yet because ADL, like its sister attack group SPLC, is entirely staffed by far left Jews, Christian watchdog groups, such as WorldNetDaily, virtually never criticize it. This must change. Christian/conservative leaders must recognize that ADL, if further protected from criticism, will only mount even more vicious anti-Christian assaults. In 1939, British diplomats Chamberlain and Asquith hoped that if Western powers remained silent and inoffensive Hitler could be contained. In reality, like a tiger, Hitler could smell their fear. Their appeasement only emboldened him to become more aggressive. The same will happen if millions of Obama protesters remain silent before ADL’s recent attack upon them. Like Hitler’s 1939 “war games” in Spain, ADL is now testing the religious and political right to see if it will publicly resist ADL’s agenda of bringing persecution to them. Persecution is the whole purpose behind ADL-orchestrated hate crimes laws worldwide. After Pres. Obama’s signing of the federal hate law last month, ADL boldly took credit not only for “spearheading” its passage over the past 12 years but also for convincing 45 U.S. states and the District of Columbia to pass some version of its “model hate crime law.” ADL Hails Long Overdue Enactment of Hate Crime Law, http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HatCr_51/5635_51.htm Will conservative leaders even mention ADL’s attack on them this week? Since ADL was founded in 1913, none has had the courage to publicly criticize it. If they did so now, it would be remarkably out of character.

 

 

Inbreeding caused demise of the Spanish Habsburg dynasty, new study reveals

One of Europe’s most powerful royal dynasties was so obsessed with securing its blue-blooded inheritance through family marriages that it brought about its own extinction through inbreeding, scientists have found.

 By Fiona Govan in Madrid
Last Updated: 1:37PM BST 15 Apr 2009

The Hapsburgs ruled Spain from 1516 to 1700, presiding over the first global empire, but died out after generations of intermarriage, according to the first genetic analysis of the family.

The royal fashion of marrying relatives to preserve the dynastic heritage culminated in a monarch who was so genetically inbred that he was unable to provide an heir and power passed to the French Bourbons.

The dynasty was one of the most important and influential royal families in Europe – branches of the family ruled Austria, Hungary, Belgium, the Netherlands, the German empire and Spain.

Scientists have examined the family tree of the last of the Spanish Habsburgs, King Charles II, who died in 1700 at the age of 39, and discovered that, as a result of repeated marriages between close relatives, he was almost as inbred as the offspring of an incestuous relationship between a brother and sister or father and daughter.

The study found that nine out of 11 marriages over the 200 years were between first cousins or uncles and nieces, producing a small gene pool that made rare recessive genetic illnesses more prevalent.

Only half of the babies born to the dynasty during the period studied lived to see their first birthday, compared with about 80 per cent of children in Spanish villages at the time.

The study, published this week in the journal Public Library of Science One, indicated that Charles II suffered from two separate rare genetic conditions, which were almost certainly the result of his ancestors’ marriage patterns and which effectively assured that the dynasty died out with him.

Nicknamed El Hechizado (“the hexed”) because of his deformities, Charles II was not only inflicted with an extreme version of the Hapsburg chin, as immortalised in portraits by Titian and Velazquez, but his tongue was said to be so big for his mouth that he had difficulty speaking and drooled.

Historical accounts record that he also suffered from an oversized head, intestinal upsets, convulsions and, according to his first wife, premature ejaculation and his second wife, impotence.

“He was unable to speak until the age of four, and could not walk until the age of eight. He was short, weak and quite lean and thin,” said Gonzalo Alvarez, of the University of Santiago de Compostela, who led the study.

“He looked like an old person when he was 30 years old, suffering edemas [swellings] on his feet, legs, abdomen and face. During the last years of his life he could barely stand up and suffered from hallucinations and convulsive episodes,” he said.

The scientists concluded that medical problems of Charles II were not random but could be symptoms of two genetic disorders; an inherited thyroid deficiency, and renal tubular acidosis, a type of kidney failure that can cause metabolic problems.

A Rainbow Warrior Shows His True Colours

By Philip Jones

4-19-9

 

 

Jonathon Porritt.

 

In a recent article in the London Daily Mail, Jonathon Porritt, the British Government’s ‘Green’ adviser, was reported as having said that couples who have more than two children were being ‘irresponsible’ by creating an intolerable burden on the environment. Mr Porritt’s short statement underlines the `Greens` deep seated phobia of the human race, and shows that Britain’s top environmental `Tsar` turns out to be not so much a friend of the earth as an enemy of humanity.   Mr Porritt believes that restricting population growth via contraception and abortion must be at the very heart of government policy in it’s crusade against `man-made` climate change. The reasoning behind this according to Porritt, is that people must now accept some form of State imposed responsibility for their total `carbon and environmental footprint’.   Even though scientifically unproven and much discredited, the ruse of `Global Warming` is being used by the Illuminists, the New Age, and their puppet `Greens` to psychologically terrify and bludgeon the world’s population into accepting ever more infringements on their personal rights and liberties, all in the name of saving the planet.   The God given blessings of a large family and the contribution that it makes to posterity, prosperity and progress don’t count at all in Porritts warped `New Age` mind. Rather, the importance of families and the number of children they have, is to be now measured solely by what he sees as their burdensome impact on the planet.   This sinister and dehumanised mindset should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed Porritts career thus far. It is no coincidence that he is on record as saying that the country which comes nearest to his ideal society is Communist China, which imposes a harsh and cruel policy of restricting families to one child apiece.   When a member of a sitting government openly expresses an opinion with the full and complete backing of that government, that it is a burden on society and the environment to have more than two children, then it is time the alarm bells started ringing. We are talking about a `depopulation agenda` here`. Nothing less. The UK reproduction rate at present, according to a 2008 United Nations study stands at 1.80, and the native population needs 2.4 children per woman of childbearing age in order to replace itself, and Comrade Porritt knows it, and so does the Labour Government.   Reproduction is humanity’s strongest instinct. To even consider interfering with this most God given and inalienable of our freedoms and desires is nothing less than Totalitarianism. Jonathon Porritt, like most of the demagogues in the upper echelons of the New Age Movement is undoubtedly aware of the agenda behind his words. He will have us believe that he possesses some kind of `inspired` and unique insight into the needs of our world which is denied to us lesser mortals. This is just another example of the monumental arrogance and contempt with which humanity is being treated by these `green` coloured propagators of Lucifer as they seek to eradicate vast swathes of humanity via the legislating of our natural reproductive rights and by yet more menacing means, in order to usher in their `Dark Age Of Aquarius`- it is also akin to the grandiose delusions of totalitarian tyrants from the Babylonian Nimrod, to the likes of Attila The Hun, Stalin, Hitler and Mao.   But then the Satanic New Age Movement, often dressed in it’s office clothes of secular liberal humanism (code words for Luciferianism), is thoroughly Totalitarian in outlook, and the `popular front` that is the Green Lobby mirrors this in it’s intolerant authoritarian global view, which it seeks to impose upon the whole world . It sees people as a nuisance in need of constant management and control. And now, it intends to put the final nail in the coffin of western civilisation by making official the restricting of human births.   Having implemented a multitude of furtive means of preventing and discouraging people from reproducing themselves sufficiently, including feminism (career first, men are bad, small family, more money), contraception, readily available abortion, together with a `kaleidoscope` of vaccines which are proven to lower the fertility rate, they appear ready to execute the next phase in this war against people.   Intentionally or otherwise, in his comments about what he calls the population `ghost at the table`, Porritt has revealed environmentalism’s true colours and they are not green, but bloody red. This was not some `loose cannon`, or some maverick sounding off. Porritt was expressing views which are mainstream within the Green Movement, endorsed entirely by the British Government, and those views are most definitively reproducing themselves at an alarming rate, even if people are not.   Recently, an international campaign was launched called, ‘Global Population Speak Out’ to publicise the supposed link between the size and growth of the human population and environmental degradation. The whole bases of it’s message was scientifically erroneous and without any validity whatsoever. Yet it attracted massive media coverage, schools were involved, the usual celebrity `muppets` grabbed their chance at some cheap publicity, and once again, the whole `Green Circus` proved to be entertainingly effective in co opting the masses into believing the lie and accepting the `guilt trip` laid on them by Porritt and his ilk.   A `Green` MD, Dr Pippa Hayes, says she will actually refuse to offer fertility treatment to women who want to have more than four children, because she believes that this places an ‘insupportable burden’ on the earth’s resources. Where is her proof? On what science does she base her conclusions?   This writer finds it highly disturbing that a medical doctor should not only have such anti-human views, but then seek to impose them upon her patients, refusing to act in their best interests, which she subordinates to an abhorrent and spurious ideology, which if one cares to play the detective can be traced back to such notables as Madame Blavatsky, Alistair Crowley and Alice Bailey, the late founder of the Lucis (Lucifer)Trust and major mover and shaker in the advancement of all things New Age and Satanic including the United Nations Organisation.   Surely, we should be able to expect our doctors to support, sustain and propagate the renewal of human life. Isn’t this their duty? Isn’t it why many conscientious doctors refuse absolutely to perform abortions. When a doctor, as in the case of Pippa Hayes, regards herself as some latter day ‘conscientious objector’ for wanting to reduce human life, she turns not just medical ethics but also the foundation of our common humanity on it’s head.   It’s not so far from that point, to where we reach the stage of regarding human beings as some kind of disease. In fact, the “We humans are like some cancer on this planet` catchphrase is becoming increasingly popular as dinner conversation here in Denmark where I live, and more so amongst what would be considered the intelligentsia. I hazard a guess it’s not much different elsewhere either.   To emphasise my point here, another prominent establishment `Green`, the former diplomat Sir Crispin Tickell – who has said we should be pursuing policies that would reduce the UK population to 20 million, or one-third of its current level – remarked recently: “Someone has said that constantly increasing growth is the doctrine of the cancer cell. You just get out of control.” From this contemptuous attitude, it is but a short step to seeing people as mere objects to be disposed of. Then when coupled with the unspoken but often implied view that the populations most in need of control, are those from the developing nations, it becomes outright racism, and can result in a not so unconscious blind spot occurring with regard to genocide. When mass slaughter took place in Rwanda in 1994 and the world stood by and did nothing, there was much talk about how this was inevitable because of the high population density that was causing land shortages and poverty.   One can see a direct correlation between the modern environmental movement and the anti-human mindset of population control. It is a fundamental tenet of `Green` ideology that human consumption is not just irresponsible and destructive, but a form of evil. Human life itself is viewed as a cancer or pollutant, and not only in relation to that `Holy Cow` of the New Age, `Man Made Climate Change`, but by the nonsensical idea that we are generally consuming and producing too much and thus eating up the planet like locusts.   The roots of this thinking go back to the 18th century British Scholar, Thomas Malthus. Malthus came to prominence for drawing attention to the potential dangers of population and stated that population growth would outstrip the earth’s resources and would lead to famine, starvation and death on a monumental scale.   Despite the fact that between Malthus’ time and the mid twentieth century, the world population increased massively and resources expanded accordingly to sustain it, Malthusian beliefs persisted in progressive circles and led to eugenics and thence to fascism. Such beliefs persist to this day and can be found alive and well in the `New Age Movement` and it’s respectable face; the Green Movement, along with the UN, EU and most if not all of the national governments of the west.   It is undeniable that there are places in the world today where people are starving. But it has little or nothing to do with any lack of natural resources. It is the callous and inhumane tyranny of the Illuminati, the UN and the World Bank and all those `sub agencies`, working for and on behalf of this nefarious cabal of conspirators which keeps the peoples of Africa, much of Latin America and vast expanses of Asia subdued and impoverished.   Actually, Comrade Porritt’s proposed two-child limit is almost surplus to requirements as far as the UK is concerned, where few families are having more than one or two children anyway, with the result that the birth rate amongst the indigenous population is now well below replacement level. In fact, last years much publicised rise in Britain’s population can be attributed in the main to the large immigrant contingent now domiciled in the UK.   The New Age’s `Green Movement` has been utilsed to great effect by the Illuminists, and has provided a cover of respectability for their `depopulation agenda` and the population control movement as a whole. Few today are aware that organisations such as `Planned Parenthood` are simply a continuation of the Eugenics program which was widespread throughout the US during the years between WWI and WWII, and many of the ideas put into practice by the Nazis had their origins in London and New York, not Berlin.   Returning our attention to Comrade Porritt, we discover that he is a patron of the UK’s `Optimum Population Trust`, which bemoans the erroneously held fact that every baby born in Britain will burn a carbon equivalent in quantity to an area of woodland the size of Trafalgar Square. Another of the Trust’s patrons, the environmental `guru` Paul R. Ehrlich, predicted in his 1968 book `The Population Bomb` that during the Seventies and Eighties hundreds of millions of people would starve to death – about 65 million of them in the U.S. – and that by the year 2000 ‘England will not exist’.   But then the whole man-made global warming theory has turned out to be just as absurd. As Britain and the rest of North West Europe shivered in one of the coldest winters in years, atmospheric data shows that the earth is getting colder, not hotter, the ice caps are becoming thicker not thinning and sea levels are more or less normal.   Yet despite the patent absurdity of these predictions of environmental catastrophe, this thinking has become internalised and now dominates political and public life totally. The reason for this is that those who operate behind the scenes, moving in and out of the shadows, whose vice like grip upon politics, the media, education and all the other channels of influence and information, are manipulating events to further their own ends and controlling our lives in order to reshape society in their `Master’s image.   In all corners of everyday life, from state interference in parenting, to telling people what they should or should not eat and drink, from local government `snoopers`, to idiotic health and safety rules, the aim is to control and change the way we behave, by micromanaging our lives. They get us with the insignificant and the petty first, and then when we acquiesce and accept their little diktats, they turn the screw just a little tighter, one turn at a time until they have us. Does anybody recognise the theme ?   The `Green Movement` cloaks this sinister tendency under the cover of what they lead us to believe is an urgent necessity to save the planet. But with people like Jonathon Porritt apparently believing that the only thing wrong with our world is the human race itself, the question begs to be asked who it is he is actually trying to save it for?   Replies to true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk

Obama And The Real Pirates/Hostage Story?

From Various Sources

4-20-9

 

The Real Story Of Obama’s ‘Decision-Making’ With The Pirates And Hostage   Having spoken to some SEAL pals here in Virginia Beach yesterday and asking why this thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:   1. Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) wouldn’t authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.   2. Once they arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE that they couldn’t do anything unless the hostage’s life was in “imminent” danger   3. The first time the hostage jumped into the sea, the SEALS had the raggies all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restriction   4. When the navy RIB came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in.   5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge CPN and SEAL teams.   6. Bainbridge CPN and SEAL team CDR finally decide they have the OpArea and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies.   7. BHO immediately claims credit for his “daring and decisive” behaviour. As usual with him, it’s BS.   Read the following accurate account.   Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn’t worked out as well. With the Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors and none was taken.   The guidance from National Command Authority, the president of the United States , Barack Obama had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.   The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft was fired on by the Somali pirates and again no fire was returned and no pirates killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by Navy personnel, thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate from the commander in chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a peaceful solution would be acceptable.   After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the onscenecommander decided he’d had enough.   Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s life, and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation had been denied the day before, the Navy officer, unnamed in all media reports to date, decided the AK47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the NSWC team to take their shots.   Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA and Philips was safe.   There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in yesterday’s dramatic rescue of an American hostage.   Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama administration and its supporters claimed victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff put paid to questions of the inexperienced president’s toughness and decisiveness.   Despite the Obama administration’s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin yesterday’s success as a result of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced president, the reality is nothing of the sort. What should have been a standoff lasting only hours, as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its team of NSWC operators to steam to the location, became an embarrassing four day and counting standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship.

Hate Laws – Ropes Around Our Throats

By Harmony Grant
2-11-9

 

As we wait to see if the noose of hate crime laws will lynch American freedoms, other nations already suffer the chokehold. President Obama backs HR 262 and 256, two ominous “anti-hate” bills (See video Hate Bill Lies: Exposed! and article ADL’s New ‘Trojan Horse’ Hate Bill at www.truthtellers.org) that will strangle US free speech rights, especially for Christians, conservatives, and anyone who criticizes a federally protected group.   Canadians, Brits, and too many others are already gripped by these laws. They squeeze the jugular of the public square, gagging anyone who expresses certain politically forbidden beliefs. Much of Europe now looks more like a Mideast dictatorship than a free Western nation.   Unless we can stop it, the federal hate law will break America’s neck the same way.   Consider the insanity.   In Britain, a senior diplomat-who served in the Mideast “and is considered an expert on the area”- was arrested for yelling at the TV while riding an exercise bike at the gym. He was watching a news report about Israel pounding the people of Gaza in their military assault. I guess the incredible injustice hit him a little too hard. I’ve had the same reaction while watching news at the gym; anger makes really good cardio.   Apparently, gym staff and members heard him shout “f***ing Israelis, f***ing Jews,” and also that Israeli soldiers should be “wiped off the face of the earth.” He was probably viewing infants and mothers whose homes were decimated, maybe bloodied men carried from exploding walls during the 22-day siege that destroyed the homes of 30,000 Palestinians and killed more than 1,330. Yeah, that could provoke a reaction.   The diplomat was later arrested and now faces up to seven years in prison, a fine, or both!     What kind of country arrests someone for an explosion of righteous anger, however crudely expressed? What kind of country arrests someone for their words? I’ll tell you: a country bound and gagged by Jewish-inspired “anti-hate” laws. Of course, these laws don’t apply to all hate. Do you think the diplomat would be in trouble if he yelled at a report about “homophobic” Christians or yelled “f***ing Klansmen” at a news spot on skinheads? Hardly. No, he’s in trouble because he blurted his honest response to Jewish evil-his state’s sacred cow.   A few other protected groups are also off limits, including Muslims and homosexuals. Whether criticism comes in a film or newspaper column or is shouted out with expletives doesn’t really matter. You can expect a knock at the door and an arrest warrant if you speak out.   Just ask Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician being prosecuted for his critique of Islam. In 2008 Wilders released a 10-minute, self-produced film, “Fitna.” Most of the film is made of quotes from the Koran and scenes of an Imam calling for Jews’ deaths. Now Wilders is being prosecuted for hate speech, six months after the court declared his speech valid. It changed its mind and he again faces possible prison time. Already his freedom is curtailed: Wilders needs constant police protection because of all the death threats he gets and can no longer travel abroad unless the destination government promises in writing not to extradite him for trial.   An insightful Haverford College student <http://www.biconews.com/?p=14089>columnist points out that “the Amsterdam court claimed that [Wilders] was liable for prosecution because the offense generated by his ‘one-sided generalizations’ outweighed his right to free speech.   “‘One-sided generalizations’ is a phrase more commonly found on professors’ comments on student essays than in criminal proceedings and would certainly justify a grade reduction. That it could also justify arrest and prosecution is laughable. That a modern, democratic nation can use ‘hate speech’ and ‘human rights’ legislation as a weapon of repression is frightening. (Another charge against Mr. Wilders was ‘insulting Muslim worshippers.’)”   This defense of democratic freedoms shouldn’t be hidden in the column of a college sophomore. Americans of all political stripes and in all positions should be jamming our lawmakers’ phones to protest that an “anti-hate” (anti-free speech) bill even made it into our legislative halls. We should shout from every column, podcast, and blog that these laws are turning Western nations into Soviet-style police states where citizens face jail time if they speak their minds!   But that isn’t happening. The alarms aren’t sounding. Even now, nearly five weeks after the federal hate crimes bills were introduced into the new Democrat-controlled Congress, the most influential Christian/conservative “watchdog” group in America, Focus on the Family, has published no alert. And so the noose inches closer to the jugular of our republic.   Canadians also, like the British and Dutch, squirm in the torturous grip of their own federal hate laws, with conservatives trying to repeal its harshest points. Canadians have been threatened by police just for seeking to distribute Christian fliers; they have been arraigned for newspaper columns; they have been fined for republishing Bible verses! Conservatives who want to take back freedom have already had their legs kicked out from under them.   If Americans want to avoid the same death of freedom, we should protest before the rope is knotted, before the “anti-hate” bills pass. If we don’t, any citizen-especially conservatives, especially Christians-can expect arrest for forbidden words uploaded to YouTube, religious concern expressed in a Letter to the Editor or banned emotions we blurt at the gym.

Michelle Obama Flashes ‘El Diablo’ Hand Signal On Cover Of Vogue

Prison Planet
Friday, February 13, 2009

Michelle Obama flashes the ‘El Diablo’ hand signal on the cover of Vogue magazine.

Texe Marrs’ book Codex Magica contains dozens of pictures of members of the elite flashing similar hand signals on the cover of magazines and newspapers. Texe explains the significance of the signal in the article below.

——————————————

Three versions of the “El Diablo,” the sign of Satan, the horned god. The hand sign at right is also the deaf’s gesture, or signing, for “I love you,” a fact which has many people confused.

Also called Il Cornuto and Diabolicus, the employment by the elite of the hand sign of the horned devil can actually be tracked all the way back to Babylon. On the great wall of Babylon, adjacent to Ishtar’s Gate, was a mosaic image of a horned bull, representing the sun god. The horns were symbolic of the Babylonian god’s power over the hearts of men.

Later, in Imperial Rome, Caesar’s military legions and millions of common people worshipped the sun god, Mithras. Mithraic initiates were baptized in the blood of a horned bull, slain and sacrificed by temple priests.

The Knights Templar, predecessor to today Scottish Rite Freemasons, worshiped the grotesque horned goat god, Baphomet. It is believed that many Illuminists continue to sacrifice to this unspeakable deity to this very day.

Reportedly, the Illuminati take great delight in seeing the masses adopt their ancient symbol of satanic worship on such a vast scale. How easy it has been for the elite to persuade the stupid and gullible to enter into satanic bondage. In giving the El Diablo, that is exactly the message the giver is signalling the devil: “I’m yours forever, Satan, heart and soul I’m yours!”

I Love You, Devil?

The “El Diablo” hand sign often is con-fused with the deaf’s signing of the phrase, “I love you.” While at first this appears an odd resemblance, we register an “ahh, I get it!” emotion when we discover that the person who invented, or created, the hand sign system for the deaf, Helen Keller, was herself an occultist and Theosophist. Did Keller purposely design the deaf’s “I love you” sign to be such a remarkable imitation of the classic sign of Satan? Was Keller saying, basically, “I love you, Devil?”

Then, we have the confusion of the El Diablo hand sign with the University of Texas “hook ‘em horns” sign. Texas’ mascot is the longhorn cow and it is only natural that the horns sign be employed by the student body, alumni, and fans of that great institution.

When Jenna Bush, the daughter of President George W. Bush, gave the horns sign at the 2004 presidential inauguration, it shocked the world. Most viewers of international TV did not know that Jenna is a recent graduate of the University of Texas. However, at that same inaugural gala, the President also was photographed giving the sign, and so was the other Bush daughter. Not only that, but the First Lady, Laura, and even the President’s mother, Barbara Bush, got into the mix. They, too, were seen giving the sign.

However, the inauguration of President George W. Bush was not the first which had featured the giving of the El Diablo sign. President Bill Clinton also did it at his first inaugural, and, in Codex Magica, you’ll see a shocking example of the El Diablo sign of Satan given at the inauguration of George Washington, our nation’s very first President!

High priest of the Church of Satan, Anton LaVey, was honored upon his death in this article in the San Francisco Chronicle. In the picture, LaVey is giving the “El Diablo” hand sign while, on the wall, is the “Baphomet” version of the satanic pentagram star. Was it mere coincidence that on the very day that this wicked satanist died in California, across the sea, in England, Illuminati chief Lord Edmond de Rothschild also passed away? Marion Berry, then Mayor of the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C. Later arrested for cocaine possession, Mayor Berry once remarked, “Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.” President George W. Bush is very adept at giving the sign. President Bill Clinton is often seen flashing the horned devil sign. Prince William of Britain’s royal family.

Partying, Drinking, Rebellion, Or…?

With the rapid rise in popularity of the El Diablo sign among rock music fans, many people seem to be blissfully unaware of the satanic background and dark history of this sign. To some, giving the sign more likely indicates eagerness and gusto for fun, partying, drinking, and rebellion.

I leave it to you, the reader, to decide which of the persons shown here and in my book, Codex Magica, rendering the El Diablo sign, are paying homage to Satan and which are employing it for some other purpose. I have my own opinion, what’s yours? For example, in Codex Magica you’ll discover former President Bill Clinton, entertainer Michael Jackson, and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi all giving the sign. Are they telling us they are Texas Longhorns fans..or that they love Satan?

Actress Meryl Streep gives the sign of the Devil just over the head of “Angels in America” director, Mike Nichols. In 2004, the HBO series “Angels in America” was aired. It was possibly the most evil TV program ever broadcast. The director and actress were given “Golden Globe” awards, indicating how hateful Hollywood and the TV networks have become. The series depicted angels having sex with homosexuals and blasphemously mocked God. It praised communist spies like Ethel Rosenberg. (Photo: Newsweek, November 17, 2003) Entertainer Michael Jackson sends a message to his fans. Watch Those Hands! Actor Jason Alexander (”George” in Seinfeld TV series) performs a cabala ritual in plain sight of a vast audience. To the uninitiated and ignorant millions of people who read TV Guide and see this cover, Jason Alexander appears to be merely hamming it up. Little do they know of the deeper occult meaning. For example, we find Jason’s left and right hands giving the “El Diablo” satanic hand sign. His arms—one pointing up, the other down—indicate the dualistic (marriage of opposites, or reconciliation), cabalistic magical philosophy “As Above, So Below” (The devil goat Baphomet performs the same sign). We also note the three triangles presented by Jason’s legs and arms.

Judging the Evidence

A final word: Even if you and I are willing to allow that the giving of this sign by some is not intentionally satanic, we cannot dismiss the evidence that many, if not most, who employ the sign are, in fact, knowingly honoring Satan, the rebellious dark angel. The case of the vampire satanists who stabbed a victim 66 times and drank his blood undeniably stamps the El Diablo hand sign given by the murderers as intensely satanic in nature.

Neither can the pictures in Codex Magica of a Hindu sect member, a witch, and of Anton LaVey, High Priest of Satan, giving the sign be disputed or explained away.

As for top-ranked Christian evangelists pictured in Codex Magica giving what appears to be the El Diablo sign, are these men servants of the One, True God as revealed in the Holy Bible, or do they cryptically serve His adversary, Lucifer? Judging from their hand gestures, what do you say? 

Research related articles:

1. Is There Such a Thing as a Michelle Obama “Whitey” Tape?
2. Obama has upper hand
3. Petraeus Testimony Will Signal Iran Attack
4. Bin police force residents to hand over personal medical details
5. Mexico’s Calderon Says Beheadings Signal Cartels’ Desperation
6. U.S. Army Ready If The Downturn Gets Out Of Hand
7. Cheney’s Dark Hand Behind Georgia Attack of South Ossetia
8. Terror Stopped For Putting My Hand In My Pocket
9. Data signal deep global downturn
10. Alex Jones Confronts Michelle Malkin at the DNC
11. COINTELPRO Returns: My First-Hand Experience With Government Spies
12. Behind Military Analysts, the Pentagon’s Hidden Hand

Kissinger Again Shills Obama and the New World Order

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
January 12, 2008

It’s too bad war criminal and Rockefeller minion Henry Kissinger is not a few decades younger. If he was, he might be turning somersaults and slapping high fives over the current state of the global economy. Instead, Kissinger has penned an ebullient — for Kissinger — editorial lauding the coming depression for the International Herald Tribune.

	Kissinger pals it up with the last CFR installed president.

According to Kissinger, the rapidly unfolding economic depression and accompanying misery for billions of people “generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy” to usher in “a world financial order” and force sovereign nations “to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action,” that is to say through world government and a New World Order, a phrase Kissinger repeats several times in the article.

“An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into being. It will fragment disastrously if the various priorities cannot be reconciled,” writes Kissinger. In other words, if nations do not embrace the “international order” in response to the bankster engineered global depression, they will be left to twist in the wind, sort of like Zimbabwe and other third world nations where absolute poverty and human misery are the rule of the day.

“The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made globally accessible via instantaneous communication. The alternative to a new international order is chaos,” Kissinger warns.

Obama the manufactured messiah out of nowhere, Kissinger writes, is the answer. “The extraordinary impact of the president-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order.”  

Obama was selected by the global elite Kissinger so faithfully serves to push the New World Order scheme, misleadingly defined by Kissinger as “an opportunity, not a policy.” Kissinger’s primary goal is to shill for world government. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. In the late 1920’s, financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation.

“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” explained Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member. “A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.”

Kissinger is merely informing us of the plan his masters have had in mind now for more than sixty years. Obama will be the front man the globalists will use to usher in the New World Order, a phrase coined by H.G. Wells when he used it as the title of a book about a socialist one-world government future. “The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used it in a 1989 speech,” writes Drew Zahn. “Kissinger’s ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what ‘new world order’ might actually mean.”

Prior to his International Herald Tribune article, Kissinger mounted the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett that in essence Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid. Obama’s “task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”

In fact, it is a classic example of the problem-reaction-solution paradigm. The banksters engineered the current economic “problem” specifically to shove their “solution” down our throats — a New World Order of total control and global totalitarianism.

Baby Boomers “Born Into a Fascist Culture”