The Zionist Elephant In The Room

 

The David Icke Newsletter
6-14-9

 

The Elephant In The Room…

 

… BUT SEE IT AND YOU’RE ‘RACIST’

 

Hello all …   The political creed of Zionism has big ears and a long trunk and I think it’s time that was pointed out. It also stampedes through our lives at every level and that needs to be said, too.   It has created a pincer-movement on the human mind by hijacking staggering amounts of political, corporate, banking and media power on one side and by using the fear of being called ‘anti-Semitic’ if you dare to state the bloody obvious.   They have been able to do this by equating in public perception that Zionism = Jewish people. It does not. Zionism is a political creed introduced by the House of Rothschild to advance the goals of the Illuminati families that are largely controlled by the Rothschilds.   When people think of Zionism they think of Jewish people. When they think of Israel they think of Jewish people. That’s understandable given the propaganda, but it is seriously misleading and those instant connections need to be broken if we are going to understand what’s going on here.   Zionism means Rothschild just as Israel means Rothschild. When we see the extraordinary number of Zionists in key positions around the world we are looking not at ‘manipulating Jews’, but manipulating Zionists representing the interests and demands of the Rothschilds.         Significant numbers of Jewish people are not Zionists and oppose that appalling creed while many Zionists are not Jewish. These include the Christian Zionists and Obama’s vice-president, Joe Biden, who told Israeli television ‘I’m a Zionist’. Here’s the clip if you can stand it … If, as Biden rightly says, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, how can it be a racial rather than a political movement? It can’t. It’s just made to appear like that to manipulate public perception because opposing Zionism then becomes opposing Jewish people as a whole and the ‘you’re a racist’ card can be played over and over.   Far from protecting and advancing the interests of the mass of Jewish people it has often been devastating for them and caused millions to be labelled unfairly by the actions of the Zionist elite. On the Jews Against Zionism website one feature highlights how Rothschild Zionism targeted Jews who had lived for generations in Palestine side-by-side with Arabs in peace and harmony:   ‘The religious Jews who by virtue of their faith, clearly contradicted Zionist nationalism, and who had lived peacefully with their Arab neighbors for generations, became unwillingly identified with the Zionist cause and their struggle with the Arabs.   They requested the United Nations that Jerusalem be designated as a defacto international city. They appealed to the diplomatic corps assigned to Jerusalem — but to no avail. They were hence confronted with the choice of either becoming a part of the Zionist State, which diametrically opposed the interests of Jews as a religion, or abandoning the land of which their forefathers were the first Jewish settlers.   Let’s get this straight. Zionism doesn’t give a damn about Jewish people. To the Rothschilds and their Zionist gofers and thugs the Jewish people as a whole are merely cattle to be used and abused as necessary – just like the rest of the human population.   The networks of the House of Rothschild were behind Hitler and the rise of the Nazi Party in the Rothschild heartland of Germany where they had changed their name from Bauer in 18th century Frankfurt and launched the dynasty that was to control global finance.   After the war the Rothschilds used public sympathy for Jewish people targeted by the Nazis to press for a homeland in Palestine. This was the alleged reason for the founding of Zionism, but that is only part of it.       Rothschild ______________________________________________     As I show in my books, the campaign to impose a Rothschild fiefdom in Palestine goes back at least to the earlier part of the 19th century and probably long before. It was given a massive boost with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 when the British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared in a letter his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine.   This letter was sent by Balfour, an inner-circle member of an elite secret society called the Round Table, to Baron (Walter) Rothschild who funded the Round Table.   Today, Rothschild Illuminati fronts like the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and others, still answer to the Round Table which string-pulls and coordinates from the shadows. This is why Zionists in government are invariably connected with these Rothschild-controlled organisations.   The Rothschilds funded the early settlers from Europe to relocate in post-war Palestine and they also funded and armed the terrorist groups, like Irgun, which bombed and terrorised Israel into existence in 1948, a campaign which forced 800,000 Palestinians to leave the land of their birth.   Israel is simply the State of Rothschild and how appropriate that they paid for the construction of the Israeli parliament building, the Knesset, and the Israel Supreme Court. The name Rothschild means Red-shield and it originates with the red shield ‘Star of David’ symbol (not a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds) which they displayed on their house in Frankfurt …        … Seen it somewhere before …?   The very flag of Israel tells you who owns it. There are many reasons why the Rothschilds and their allies wanted to hijack Palestine and one was to keep the Middle East in a state of disruption and turmoil from which a global war can eventually be triggered to usher in the New World Order of world government dictatorship.   The creation of Israel is a means not an end and the Rothschilds will be quite happy to leave the Jewish population to their fate if it suits them. After all, they’ve done it before.   The world’s second biggest Zionist population is in the United States and given that both America and Israel are controlled by the Rothschild networks it is not hard to fathom why that slither of land in the Middle East receives around a third of all US overseas aid.   An average $3 billion a year is handed to the State of Rothschild as a result of decisions made by American administrations that are always, ‘Republican’ or ‘Democrat’, controlled by the Rothschilds. One hand of the network hands over the cash to another.   This explains why the United States never talks about the arsenal of nuclear weapons stockpiled by one of the world’s most trigger-happy states. Israel refuses to discuss them and the American policy, recently reconfirmed by Obama, is never to ask or bring up the subject.   The last two US administrations are testament to the extent of Zionist (Rothschild) control of America and thus its foreign policy, not least with regard to Iraq, the former land of Sumer and Babylon, which according to some just happens to be part of the ‘Greater Israel’ that the Zionists seek to secure.   The ‘Bush’ government was the glove-puppet of the so-called neo-cons, or neoconservatives, whose only political philosophy in truth was the interests of Zionism. At the heart of the Rothschild-controlled neocon cabal were Richard Perle (Zionist), Paul Wolfowitz (Zionist), Dov Zakheim (Zionist), Douglas Feith (Zionist), John Bolton (Zionist), Lewis Libby (Zionist), the list goes on and on. These were the people who orchestrated the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq on behalf of the Rothschilds.         Economic policy was dictated through the years of Reagan-Bush, Father Bush, Clinton and most of Boy Bush by Alan Greenspan (Zionist), chairman of the privately-owned US ‘central bank’, the Federal Reserve. Privately owned, that is, by the Rothschilds through a network of front people and organisations.   Greenspan introduced the policies of deregulation that culminated, as designed, in the free-for-all frenzy of greed by banks and financial markets in general that led to the crash in the last weeks of the Bush presidency. Greenspan resigned from the Fed before the consequences of his long-term game-plan exploded in lost homes, jobs and savings. He was replaced by Bernard Bernanke (Zionist).   Greenspan was enthusiastically supported in his deregulation through successive administrations by Treasury Secretaries in the Clinton years, Robert E. Rubin (Zionist) and Larry Summers (Zionist), and also by the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the most powerful in the Fed cabal, Timothy Geithner (Zionist).   When Mr. Fake Change won the presidency amid the gathering financial crisis, caused by all of the above, and others, he appointed Geithner as his Treasury Secretary and Summers as head of the White House Economic Council. Both are protégés of Robert Rubin who resigned from Citigroup earlier this year for his role in ‘advising’ it to the brink of collapse.   Obama’s Budget Director is Peter Orszag (Zionist) who headed the company that advised the Icelandic Central Bank in the prelude to the crash of Iceland’s financial system. This has led to Iceland being fast-tracked into the Rothschild-created European Union to ’save’ its economy. Orszag also advised the Russian Treasury when state-owned assets and resources were handed to Zionist oligarchs, including Roman Abramovich who is famous in the UK as the owner of Chelsea Football Club.   Add to all this the fact that the World Bank is headed by Robert Zoellick (Zionist), who replaced Paul Wolfowitz (Zionist), and that the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, is run by Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Zionist).   Anyone still doubt that the Rothschild network controls global finance and therefore the lives and choices of virtually every man, woman and child on the planet?   The Rothschilds are at the heart of the Obama White House in the form of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (Zionist) and Chief White House Advisor David Axelrod (Zionist). Emanuel has served in the Israeli army and his father was an operative with the Rothschild terrorist group, Irgun, as it bombed Israel into being. This included the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946 that killed 91 people.         Rahm Emanuel also worked closely Robert E. Rubin (Zionist) during the Clinton years to impose NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, which was designed from the start to be a stepping-stone to a North American, and eventually an American Union, along the lines of the EU. The Zionist world is very small indeed.   David Axelrod ran Obama’s election campaigns and now oversees his every word slavishly read from his teleprompter screens. There is little that Obama says that his Zionist handlers don’t tell him or give him to say.   They have also ensured that US policy for Iran and the Persian Gulf is headed by Dennis Ross (Zionist) who has served Israeli interests in successive American administrations. There will not be a cigarette paper behind the scenes between him and that trio of tyranny, Netanyahu, Lieberman, Barak, the prime minister, foreign minister and defence minister of Israel. Rothschild stooges, in other words.   Zionist Mandelson works for the pyramid   The most influential figure by far in the current British government is Peter Mandelson (Zionist) who continues to amass more titles and powers from the beleaguered Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Mandelson is an insider operative for the Rothschilds and has frequently accepted hospitality from his close friend and associate, Nathaniel Rothschild. This week Mandelson called for the UK to join the (Rothschild) single European currency.   Meanwhile, the hapless and hopeless Gordon Brown did as he was told and appointed Ivan Lewis (Zionist) to be minister of state with responsibility for, wait for it … British policy on the Middle East. Lewis, vice-chair of the Labour Friends of Israel, was an outspoken supporter of Israel’s slaughter of the innocent in Gaza this year. Lewis said of his new job:   ‘My responsibility for the Middle East peace process is particularly poignant. I have never hidden my pride at being Jewish or my support for the State of Israel.’   What chance do the Palestinians have of fairness and justice? None.   In France, as I mentioned last week, President Sarkozy (Zionist) is a long-time asset of Mossad, the Rothschild enforcement agency masquerading as the intelligence agency of Israel. Mossad has been implicated in terror attacks and other horrors all over the world because it represents the Rothschild global agenda and not the people of Israel.         French President Sarkozy (Zionist Jew) _______________________________________     Look also at the Zionist (Rothschild) control of the entertainment and media industry in the form of people like Fox News President Peter Chernin (Zionist); Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Zionist); Walt Disney CEO Robert Igor (Zionist); Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (Zionist); Warner Brothers Chairman Barry Meyer (Zionist); CBS CEO Leslie Moonves (Zionist); MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Zionist); and NBC/Universal Studios CEO Jeff Zucker (Zionist).         The Rothschilds control America   The Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein (Zionist) wrote an article proclaiming that Americans who don’t think Jews (Zionists) control Hollywood are just plain ‘dumb’. Stein went on:   ‘The Jews are so dominant. I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. But lo and behold, even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew! … As a proud Jew, I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.’   And not only Hollywood. Shahar Ilan, a daily features editor with the leading Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, wrote: ‘The Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge’. Zionists have truly massive influence over the news media with the likes of Rupert Murdoch (Zionist) with his vast television and newspaper empire, and the Sulzberger family (Zionists) who own the New York Times. The list is enormous across television, radio, newspapers and the Internet.   When you look at the number of Zionists in key positions of power and control in politics, banking, corporations, news media, Hollywood and so on, it is sobering to think that Jewish people are just 1.7% of the American population and many of those won’t be Zionists.   What if the same situation happened with Arab people or Chinese, Irish or even black Americans? There would be an outcry and questions asked about how one group can have so much influence over the lives of a whole nation, indeed many nations. And I stress again that, in the end, this control system leads to the Rothschilds and the spider they represent at the centre of the web.         B’nai Brith Front Man Harry Abrams ____________________________     The Rothschilds established B’nai B’rith in 1843 to prevent exposure of the global Zionist networks. The ‘ BB’ is an offshoot of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and operates worldwide to brand as ‘anti-Semitic’ anyone who exposes the Rothschild operation.   In 1913, B’nai B’rith launched an organisation specifically to target and defame researchers, in fact anyone, who questions, criticises or exposes Israel and the ever-gathering Zionist influence across the world. With typical irony they called it the Anti-Defamation League, better known as the ADL, and claimed it was there to protect Jewish people. As Plato said: ‘This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector’.   The ADL is, in fact, a sub-agency of the Israeli (Rothschild) centre for covert operations, the Mossad, which, according to a former agent, has the motto: ‘By way of deception, thou shalt do war’. If that isn’t the motto, it should be. The ADL is behind the introduction of ‘hate laws’ which are aimed at silencing dissent against Zionism or Israel. The Jewish academic, Noam Chomsky, said this of the ADL in his book, Necessary Illusions:   ‘The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming “one of the main pillars” of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.   These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel’s refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement.’   The American rabbi, Michael Lerner, agrees:   ‘The ADL lost most of it credibility in my eyes as a civil rights organization when it began to identify criticisms of Israel with anti-Semitism, still more when it failed to defend me when I was receiving threats to my life from right-wing Jewish groups because of my critique of Israeli policy toward Palestinians (it said that these were not threats that came from my being Jewish, so therefore they were not within their area of concern).’   Firstly, the ADL has never been a civil rights organisation. Its very purpose has been to take them away. Secondly, it is not there to defend anyone, Jewish or otherwise. It’s there to represent the sadistic interests of the House of Rothschild and the wider Illuminati.         It is so important that people are aware of this background to Zionism because at the moment it is basically speeding along unchallenged through lack of awareness and fear of being dubbed ‘racist’.   Well, I couldn’t care less what people say about me with regard to this or anything else. I want to uncover the truth, not win a popularity contest.   Please, let’s circulate this information as effectively as we can and bring it from the shadows to public attention. We must refuse to be intimidated into silence over this.   Martin Luther King said: ‘… we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can’t ride you unless your back is bent.’   It is time to stand up, in every sense.

Inbreeding caused demise of the Spanish Habsburg dynasty, new study reveals

One of Europe’s most powerful royal dynasties was so obsessed with securing its blue-blooded inheritance through family marriages that it brought about its own extinction through inbreeding, scientists have found.

 By Fiona Govan in Madrid
Last Updated: 1:37PM BST 15 Apr 2009

The Hapsburgs ruled Spain from 1516 to 1700, presiding over the first global empire, but died out after generations of intermarriage, according to the first genetic analysis of the family.

The royal fashion of marrying relatives to preserve the dynastic heritage culminated in a monarch who was so genetically inbred that he was unable to provide an heir and power passed to the French Bourbons.

The dynasty was one of the most important and influential royal families in Europe – branches of the family ruled Austria, Hungary, Belgium, the Netherlands, the German empire and Spain.

Scientists have examined the family tree of the last of the Spanish Habsburgs, King Charles II, who died in 1700 at the age of 39, and discovered that, as a result of repeated marriages between close relatives, he was almost as inbred as the offspring of an incestuous relationship between a brother and sister or father and daughter.

The study found that nine out of 11 marriages over the 200 years were between first cousins or uncles and nieces, producing a small gene pool that made rare recessive genetic illnesses more prevalent.

Only half of the babies born to the dynasty during the period studied lived to see their first birthday, compared with about 80 per cent of children in Spanish villages at the time.

The study, published this week in the journal Public Library of Science One, indicated that Charles II suffered from two separate rare genetic conditions, which were almost certainly the result of his ancestors’ marriage patterns and which effectively assured that the dynasty died out with him.

Nicknamed El Hechizado (“the hexed”) because of his deformities, Charles II was not only inflicted with an extreme version of the Hapsburg chin, as immortalised in portraits by Titian and Velazquez, but his tongue was said to be so big for his mouth that he had difficulty speaking and drooled.

Historical accounts record that he also suffered from an oversized head, intestinal upsets, convulsions and, according to his first wife, premature ejaculation and his second wife, impotence.

“He was unable to speak until the age of four, and could not walk until the age of eight. He was short, weak and quite lean and thin,” said Gonzalo Alvarez, of the University of Santiago de Compostela, who led the study.

“He looked like an old person when he was 30 years old, suffering edemas [swellings] on his feet, legs, abdomen and face. During the last years of his life he could barely stand up and suffered from hallucinations and convulsive episodes,” he said.

The scientists concluded that medical problems of Charles II were not random but could be symptoms of two genetic disorders; an inherited thyroid deficiency, and renal tubular acidosis, a type of kidney failure that can cause metabolic problems.

A Rainbow Warrior Shows His True Colours

By Philip Jones

4-19-9

 

 

Jonathon Porritt.

 

In a recent article in the London Daily Mail, Jonathon Porritt, the British Government’s ‘Green’ adviser, was reported as having said that couples who have more than two children were being ‘irresponsible’ by creating an intolerable burden on the environment. Mr Porritt’s short statement underlines the `Greens` deep seated phobia of the human race, and shows that Britain’s top environmental `Tsar` turns out to be not so much a friend of the earth as an enemy of humanity.   Mr Porritt believes that restricting population growth via contraception and abortion must be at the very heart of government policy in it’s crusade against `man-made` climate change. The reasoning behind this according to Porritt, is that people must now accept some form of State imposed responsibility for their total `carbon and environmental footprint’.   Even though scientifically unproven and much discredited, the ruse of `Global Warming` is being used by the Illuminists, the New Age, and their puppet `Greens` to psychologically terrify and bludgeon the world’s population into accepting ever more infringements on their personal rights and liberties, all in the name of saving the planet.   The God given blessings of a large family and the contribution that it makes to posterity, prosperity and progress don’t count at all in Porritts warped `New Age` mind. Rather, the importance of families and the number of children they have, is to be now measured solely by what he sees as their burdensome impact on the planet.   This sinister and dehumanised mindset should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed Porritts career thus far. It is no coincidence that he is on record as saying that the country which comes nearest to his ideal society is Communist China, which imposes a harsh and cruel policy of restricting families to one child apiece.   When a member of a sitting government openly expresses an opinion with the full and complete backing of that government, that it is a burden on society and the environment to have more than two children, then it is time the alarm bells started ringing. We are talking about a `depopulation agenda` here`. Nothing less. The UK reproduction rate at present, according to a 2008 United Nations study stands at 1.80, and the native population needs 2.4 children per woman of childbearing age in order to replace itself, and Comrade Porritt knows it, and so does the Labour Government.   Reproduction is humanity’s strongest instinct. To even consider interfering with this most God given and inalienable of our freedoms and desires is nothing less than Totalitarianism. Jonathon Porritt, like most of the demagogues in the upper echelons of the New Age Movement is undoubtedly aware of the agenda behind his words. He will have us believe that he possesses some kind of `inspired` and unique insight into the needs of our world which is denied to us lesser mortals. This is just another example of the monumental arrogance and contempt with which humanity is being treated by these `green` coloured propagators of Lucifer as they seek to eradicate vast swathes of humanity via the legislating of our natural reproductive rights and by yet more menacing means, in order to usher in their `Dark Age Of Aquarius`- it is also akin to the grandiose delusions of totalitarian tyrants from the Babylonian Nimrod, to the likes of Attila The Hun, Stalin, Hitler and Mao.   But then the Satanic New Age Movement, often dressed in it’s office clothes of secular liberal humanism (code words for Luciferianism), is thoroughly Totalitarian in outlook, and the `popular front` that is the Green Lobby mirrors this in it’s intolerant authoritarian global view, which it seeks to impose upon the whole world . It sees people as a nuisance in need of constant management and control. And now, it intends to put the final nail in the coffin of western civilisation by making official the restricting of human births.   Having implemented a multitude of furtive means of preventing and discouraging people from reproducing themselves sufficiently, including feminism (career first, men are bad, small family, more money), contraception, readily available abortion, together with a `kaleidoscope` of vaccines which are proven to lower the fertility rate, they appear ready to execute the next phase in this war against people.   Intentionally or otherwise, in his comments about what he calls the population `ghost at the table`, Porritt has revealed environmentalism’s true colours and they are not green, but bloody red. This was not some `loose cannon`, or some maverick sounding off. Porritt was expressing views which are mainstream within the Green Movement, endorsed entirely by the British Government, and those views are most definitively reproducing themselves at an alarming rate, even if people are not.   Recently, an international campaign was launched called, ‘Global Population Speak Out’ to publicise the supposed link between the size and growth of the human population and environmental degradation. The whole bases of it’s message was scientifically erroneous and without any validity whatsoever. Yet it attracted massive media coverage, schools were involved, the usual celebrity `muppets` grabbed their chance at some cheap publicity, and once again, the whole `Green Circus` proved to be entertainingly effective in co opting the masses into believing the lie and accepting the `guilt trip` laid on them by Porritt and his ilk.   A `Green` MD, Dr Pippa Hayes, says she will actually refuse to offer fertility treatment to women who want to have more than four children, because she believes that this places an ‘insupportable burden’ on the earth’s resources. Where is her proof? On what science does she base her conclusions?   This writer finds it highly disturbing that a medical doctor should not only have such anti-human views, but then seek to impose them upon her patients, refusing to act in their best interests, which she subordinates to an abhorrent and spurious ideology, which if one cares to play the detective can be traced back to such notables as Madame Blavatsky, Alistair Crowley and Alice Bailey, the late founder of the Lucis (Lucifer)Trust and major mover and shaker in the advancement of all things New Age and Satanic including the United Nations Organisation.   Surely, we should be able to expect our doctors to support, sustain and propagate the renewal of human life. Isn’t this their duty? Isn’t it why many conscientious doctors refuse absolutely to perform abortions. When a doctor, as in the case of Pippa Hayes, regards herself as some latter day ‘conscientious objector’ for wanting to reduce human life, she turns not just medical ethics but also the foundation of our common humanity on it’s head.   It’s not so far from that point, to where we reach the stage of regarding human beings as some kind of disease. In fact, the “We humans are like some cancer on this planet` catchphrase is becoming increasingly popular as dinner conversation here in Denmark where I live, and more so amongst what would be considered the intelligentsia. I hazard a guess it’s not much different elsewhere either.   To emphasise my point here, another prominent establishment `Green`, the former diplomat Sir Crispin Tickell – who has said we should be pursuing policies that would reduce the UK population to 20 million, or one-third of its current level – remarked recently: “Someone has said that constantly increasing growth is the doctrine of the cancer cell. You just get out of control.” From this contemptuous attitude, it is but a short step to seeing people as mere objects to be disposed of. Then when coupled with the unspoken but often implied view that the populations most in need of control, are those from the developing nations, it becomes outright racism, and can result in a not so unconscious blind spot occurring with regard to genocide. When mass slaughter took place in Rwanda in 1994 and the world stood by and did nothing, there was much talk about how this was inevitable because of the high population density that was causing land shortages and poverty.   One can see a direct correlation between the modern environmental movement and the anti-human mindset of population control. It is a fundamental tenet of `Green` ideology that human consumption is not just irresponsible and destructive, but a form of evil. Human life itself is viewed as a cancer or pollutant, and not only in relation to that `Holy Cow` of the New Age, `Man Made Climate Change`, but by the nonsensical idea that we are generally consuming and producing too much and thus eating up the planet like locusts.   The roots of this thinking go back to the 18th century British Scholar, Thomas Malthus. Malthus came to prominence for drawing attention to the potential dangers of population and stated that population growth would outstrip the earth’s resources and would lead to famine, starvation and death on a monumental scale.   Despite the fact that between Malthus’ time and the mid twentieth century, the world population increased massively and resources expanded accordingly to sustain it, Malthusian beliefs persisted in progressive circles and led to eugenics and thence to fascism. Such beliefs persist to this day and can be found alive and well in the `New Age Movement` and it’s respectable face; the Green Movement, along with the UN, EU and most if not all of the national governments of the west.   It is undeniable that there are places in the world today where people are starving. But it has little or nothing to do with any lack of natural resources. It is the callous and inhumane tyranny of the Illuminati, the UN and the World Bank and all those `sub agencies`, working for and on behalf of this nefarious cabal of conspirators which keeps the peoples of Africa, much of Latin America and vast expanses of Asia subdued and impoverished.   Actually, Comrade Porritt’s proposed two-child limit is almost surplus to requirements as far as the UK is concerned, where few families are having more than one or two children anyway, with the result that the birth rate amongst the indigenous population is now well below replacement level. In fact, last years much publicised rise in Britain’s population can be attributed in the main to the large immigrant contingent now domiciled in the UK.   The New Age’s `Green Movement` has been utilsed to great effect by the Illuminists, and has provided a cover of respectability for their `depopulation agenda` and the population control movement as a whole. Few today are aware that organisations such as `Planned Parenthood` are simply a continuation of the Eugenics program which was widespread throughout the US during the years between WWI and WWII, and many of the ideas put into practice by the Nazis had their origins in London and New York, not Berlin.   Returning our attention to Comrade Porritt, we discover that he is a patron of the UK’s `Optimum Population Trust`, which bemoans the erroneously held fact that every baby born in Britain will burn a carbon equivalent in quantity to an area of woodland the size of Trafalgar Square. Another of the Trust’s patrons, the environmental `guru` Paul R. Ehrlich, predicted in his 1968 book `The Population Bomb` that during the Seventies and Eighties hundreds of millions of people would starve to death – about 65 million of them in the U.S. – and that by the year 2000 ‘England will not exist’.   But then the whole man-made global warming theory has turned out to be just as absurd. As Britain and the rest of North West Europe shivered in one of the coldest winters in years, atmospheric data shows that the earth is getting colder, not hotter, the ice caps are becoming thicker not thinning and sea levels are more or less normal.   Yet despite the patent absurdity of these predictions of environmental catastrophe, this thinking has become internalised and now dominates political and public life totally. The reason for this is that those who operate behind the scenes, moving in and out of the shadows, whose vice like grip upon politics, the media, education and all the other channels of influence and information, are manipulating events to further their own ends and controlling our lives in order to reshape society in their `Master’s image.   In all corners of everyday life, from state interference in parenting, to telling people what they should or should not eat and drink, from local government `snoopers`, to idiotic health and safety rules, the aim is to control and change the way we behave, by micromanaging our lives. They get us with the insignificant and the petty first, and then when we acquiesce and accept their little diktats, they turn the screw just a little tighter, one turn at a time until they have us. Does anybody recognise the theme ?   The `Green Movement` cloaks this sinister tendency under the cover of what they lead us to believe is an urgent necessity to save the planet. But with people like Jonathon Porritt apparently believing that the only thing wrong with our world is the human race itself, the question begs to be asked who it is he is actually trying to save it for?   Replies to true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk

Obama And The Real Pirates/Hostage Story?

From Various Sources

4-20-9

 

The Real Story Of Obama’s ‘Decision-Making’ With The Pirates And Hostage   Having spoken to some SEAL pals here in Virginia Beach yesterday and asking why this thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:   1. Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) wouldn’t authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.   2. Once they arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE that they couldn’t do anything unless the hostage’s life was in “imminent” danger   3. The first time the hostage jumped into the sea, the SEALS had the raggies all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restriction   4. When the navy RIB came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in.   5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge CPN and SEAL teams.   6. Bainbridge CPN and SEAL team CDR finally decide they have the OpArea and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies.   7. BHO immediately claims credit for his “daring and decisive” behaviour. As usual with him, it’s BS.   Read the following accurate account.   Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn’t worked out as well. With the Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors and none was taken.   The guidance from National Command Authority, the president of the United States , Barack Obama had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.   The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft was fired on by the Somali pirates and again no fire was returned and no pirates killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by Navy personnel, thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate from the commander in chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a peaceful solution would be acceptable.   After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the onscenecommander decided he’d had enough.   Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s life, and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation had been denied the day before, the Navy officer, unnamed in all media reports to date, decided the AK47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the NSWC team to take their shots.   Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA and Philips was safe.   There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in yesterday’s dramatic rescue of an American hostage.   Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama administration and its supporters claimed victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff put paid to questions of the inexperienced president’s toughness and decisiveness.   Despite the Obama administration’s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin yesterday’s success as a result of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced president, the reality is nothing of the sort. What should have been a standoff lasting only hours, as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its team of NSWC operators to steam to the location, became an embarrassing four day and counting standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship.

Hate Laws – Ropes Around Our Throats

By Harmony Grant
2-11-9

 

As we wait to see if the noose of hate crime laws will lynch American freedoms, other nations already suffer the chokehold. President Obama backs HR 262 and 256, two ominous “anti-hate” bills (See video Hate Bill Lies: Exposed! and article ADL’s New ‘Trojan Horse’ Hate Bill at www.truthtellers.org) that will strangle US free speech rights, especially for Christians, conservatives, and anyone who criticizes a federally protected group.   Canadians, Brits, and too many others are already gripped by these laws. They squeeze the jugular of the public square, gagging anyone who expresses certain politically forbidden beliefs. Much of Europe now looks more like a Mideast dictatorship than a free Western nation.   Unless we can stop it, the federal hate law will break America’s neck the same way.   Consider the insanity.   In Britain, a senior diplomat-who served in the Mideast “and is considered an expert on the area”- was arrested for yelling at the TV while riding an exercise bike at the gym. He was watching a news report about Israel pounding the people of Gaza in their military assault. I guess the incredible injustice hit him a little too hard. I’ve had the same reaction while watching news at the gym; anger makes really good cardio.   Apparently, gym staff and members heard him shout “f***ing Israelis, f***ing Jews,” and also that Israeli soldiers should be “wiped off the face of the earth.” He was probably viewing infants and mothers whose homes were decimated, maybe bloodied men carried from exploding walls during the 22-day siege that destroyed the homes of 30,000 Palestinians and killed more than 1,330. Yeah, that could provoke a reaction.   The diplomat was later arrested and now faces up to seven years in prison, a fine, or both!     What kind of country arrests someone for an explosion of righteous anger, however crudely expressed? What kind of country arrests someone for their words? I’ll tell you: a country bound and gagged by Jewish-inspired “anti-hate” laws. Of course, these laws don’t apply to all hate. Do you think the diplomat would be in trouble if he yelled at a report about “homophobic” Christians or yelled “f***ing Klansmen” at a news spot on skinheads? Hardly. No, he’s in trouble because he blurted his honest response to Jewish evil-his state’s sacred cow.   A few other protected groups are also off limits, including Muslims and homosexuals. Whether criticism comes in a film or newspaper column or is shouted out with expletives doesn’t really matter. You can expect a knock at the door and an arrest warrant if you speak out.   Just ask Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician being prosecuted for his critique of Islam. In 2008 Wilders released a 10-minute, self-produced film, “Fitna.” Most of the film is made of quotes from the Koran and scenes of an Imam calling for Jews’ deaths. Now Wilders is being prosecuted for hate speech, six months after the court declared his speech valid. It changed its mind and he again faces possible prison time. Already his freedom is curtailed: Wilders needs constant police protection because of all the death threats he gets and can no longer travel abroad unless the destination government promises in writing not to extradite him for trial.   An insightful Haverford College student <http://www.biconews.com/?p=14089>columnist points out that “the Amsterdam court claimed that [Wilders] was liable for prosecution because the offense generated by his ‘one-sided generalizations’ outweighed his right to free speech.   “‘One-sided generalizations’ is a phrase more commonly found on professors’ comments on student essays than in criminal proceedings and would certainly justify a grade reduction. That it could also justify arrest and prosecution is laughable. That a modern, democratic nation can use ‘hate speech’ and ‘human rights’ legislation as a weapon of repression is frightening. (Another charge against Mr. Wilders was ‘insulting Muslim worshippers.’)”   This defense of democratic freedoms shouldn’t be hidden in the column of a college sophomore. Americans of all political stripes and in all positions should be jamming our lawmakers’ phones to protest that an “anti-hate” (anti-free speech) bill even made it into our legislative halls. We should shout from every column, podcast, and blog that these laws are turning Western nations into Soviet-style police states where citizens face jail time if they speak their minds!   But that isn’t happening. The alarms aren’t sounding. Even now, nearly five weeks after the federal hate crimes bills were introduced into the new Democrat-controlled Congress, the most influential Christian/conservative “watchdog” group in America, Focus on the Family, has published no alert. And so the noose inches closer to the jugular of our republic.   Canadians also, like the British and Dutch, squirm in the torturous grip of their own federal hate laws, with conservatives trying to repeal its harshest points. Canadians have been threatened by police just for seeking to distribute Christian fliers; they have been arraigned for newspaper columns; they have been fined for republishing Bible verses! Conservatives who want to take back freedom have already had their legs kicked out from under them.   If Americans want to avoid the same death of freedom, we should protest before the rope is knotted, before the “anti-hate” bills pass. If we don’t, any citizen-especially conservatives, especially Christians-can expect arrest for forbidden words uploaded to YouTube, religious concern expressed in a Letter to the Editor or banned emotions we blurt at the gym.

Michelle Obama Flashes ‘El Diablo’ Hand Signal On Cover Of Vogue

Prison Planet
Friday, February 13, 2009

Michelle Obama flashes the ‘El Diablo’ hand signal on the cover of Vogue magazine.

Texe Marrs’ book Codex Magica contains dozens of pictures of members of the elite flashing similar hand signals on the cover of magazines and newspapers. Texe explains the significance of the signal in the article below.

——————————————

Three versions of the “El Diablo,” the sign of Satan, the horned god. The hand sign at right is also the deaf’s gesture, or signing, for “I love you,” a fact which has many people confused.

Also called Il Cornuto and Diabolicus, the employment by the elite of the hand sign of the horned devil can actually be tracked all the way back to Babylon. On the great wall of Babylon, adjacent to Ishtar’s Gate, was a mosaic image of a horned bull, representing the sun god. The horns were symbolic of the Babylonian god’s power over the hearts of men.

Later, in Imperial Rome, Caesar’s military legions and millions of common people worshipped the sun god, Mithras. Mithraic initiates were baptized in the blood of a horned bull, slain and sacrificed by temple priests.

The Knights Templar, predecessor to today Scottish Rite Freemasons, worshiped the grotesque horned goat god, Baphomet. It is believed that many Illuminists continue to sacrifice to this unspeakable deity to this very day.

Reportedly, the Illuminati take great delight in seeing the masses adopt their ancient symbol of satanic worship on such a vast scale. How easy it has been for the elite to persuade the stupid and gullible to enter into satanic bondage. In giving the El Diablo, that is exactly the message the giver is signalling the devil: “I’m yours forever, Satan, heart and soul I’m yours!”

I Love You, Devil?

The “El Diablo” hand sign often is con-fused with the deaf’s signing of the phrase, “I love you.” While at first this appears an odd resemblance, we register an “ahh, I get it!” emotion when we discover that the person who invented, or created, the hand sign system for the deaf, Helen Keller, was herself an occultist and Theosophist. Did Keller purposely design the deaf’s “I love you” sign to be such a remarkable imitation of the classic sign of Satan? Was Keller saying, basically, “I love you, Devil?”

Then, we have the confusion of the El Diablo hand sign with the University of Texas “hook ‘em horns” sign. Texas’ mascot is the longhorn cow and it is only natural that the horns sign be employed by the student body, alumni, and fans of that great institution.

When Jenna Bush, the daughter of President George W. Bush, gave the horns sign at the 2004 presidential inauguration, it shocked the world. Most viewers of international TV did not know that Jenna is a recent graduate of the University of Texas. However, at that same inaugural gala, the President also was photographed giving the sign, and so was the other Bush daughter. Not only that, but the First Lady, Laura, and even the President’s mother, Barbara Bush, got into the mix. They, too, were seen giving the sign.

However, the inauguration of President George W. Bush was not the first which had featured the giving of the El Diablo sign. President Bill Clinton also did it at his first inaugural, and, in Codex Magica, you’ll see a shocking example of the El Diablo sign of Satan given at the inauguration of George Washington, our nation’s very first President!

High priest of the Church of Satan, Anton LaVey, was honored upon his death in this article in the San Francisco Chronicle. In the picture, LaVey is giving the “El Diablo” hand sign while, on the wall, is the “Baphomet” version of the satanic pentagram star. Was it mere coincidence that on the very day that this wicked satanist died in California, across the sea, in England, Illuminati chief Lord Edmond de Rothschild also passed away? Marion Berry, then Mayor of the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C. Later arrested for cocaine possession, Mayor Berry once remarked, “Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.” President George W. Bush is very adept at giving the sign. President Bill Clinton is often seen flashing the horned devil sign. Prince William of Britain’s royal family.

Partying, Drinking, Rebellion, Or…?

With the rapid rise in popularity of the El Diablo sign among rock music fans, many people seem to be blissfully unaware of the satanic background and dark history of this sign. To some, giving the sign more likely indicates eagerness and gusto for fun, partying, drinking, and rebellion.

I leave it to you, the reader, to decide which of the persons shown here and in my book, Codex Magica, rendering the El Diablo sign, are paying homage to Satan and which are employing it for some other purpose. I have my own opinion, what’s yours? For example, in Codex Magica you’ll discover former President Bill Clinton, entertainer Michael Jackson, and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi all giving the sign. Are they telling us they are Texas Longhorns fans..or that they love Satan?

Actress Meryl Streep gives the sign of the Devil just over the head of “Angels in America” director, Mike Nichols. In 2004, the HBO series “Angels in America” was aired. It was possibly the most evil TV program ever broadcast. The director and actress were given “Golden Globe” awards, indicating how hateful Hollywood and the TV networks have become. The series depicted angels having sex with homosexuals and blasphemously mocked God. It praised communist spies like Ethel Rosenberg. (Photo: Newsweek, November 17, 2003) Entertainer Michael Jackson sends a message to his fans. Watch Those Hands! Actor Jason Alexander (”George” in Seinfeld TV series) performs a cabala ritual in plain sight of a vast audience. To the uninitiated and ignorant millions of people who read TV Guide and see this cover, Jason Alexander appears to be merely hamming it up. Little do they know of the deeper occult meaning. For example, we find Jason’s left and right hands giving the “El Diablo” satanic hand sign. His arms—one pointing up, the other down—indicate the dualistic (marriage of opposites, or reconciliation), cabalistic magical philosophy “As Above, So Below” (The devil goat Baphomet performs the same sign). We also note the three triangles presented by Jason’s legs and arms.

Judging the Evidence

A final word: Even if you and I are willing to allow that the giving of this sign by some is not intentionally satanic, we cannot dismiss the evidence that many, if not most, who employ the sign are, in fact, knowingly honoring Satan, the rebellious dark angel. The case of the vampire satanists who stabbed a victim 66 times and drank his blood undeniably stamps the El Diablo hand sign given by the murderers as intensely satanic in nature.

Neither can the pictures in Codex Magica of a Hindu sect member, a witch, and of Anton LaVey, High Priest of Satan, giving the sign be disputed or explained away.

As for top-ranked Christian evangelists pictured in Codex Magica giving what appears to be the El Diablo sign, are these men servants of the One, True God as revealed in the Holy Bible, or do they cryptically serve His adversary, Lucifer? Judging from their hand gestures, what do you say? 

Research related articles:

1. Is There Such a Thing as a Michelle Obama “Whitey” Tape?
2. Obama has upper hand
3. Petraeus Testimony Will Signal Iran Attack
4. Bin police force residents to hand over personal medical details
5. Mexico’s Calderon Says Beheadings Signal Cartels’ Desperation
6. U.S. Army Ready If The Downturn Gets Out Of Hand
7. Cheney’s Dark Hand Behind Georgia Attack of South Ossetia
8. Terror Stopped For Putting My Hand In My Pocket
9. Data signal deep global downturn
10. Alex Jones Confronts Michelle Malkin at the DNC
11. COINTELPRO Returns: My First-Hand Experience With Government Spies
12. Behind Military Analysts, the Pentagon’s Hidden Hand

Kissinger Again Shills Obama and the New World Order

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
January 12, 2008

It’s too bad war criminal and Rockefeller minion Henry Kissinger is not a few decades younger. If he was, he might be turning somersaults and slapping high fives over the current state of the global economy. Instead, Kissinger has penned an ebullient — for Kissinger — editorial lauding the coming depression for the International Herald Tribune.

	Kissinger pals it up with the last CFR installed president.

According to Kissinger, the rapidly unfolding economic depression and accompanying misery for billions of people “generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy” to usher in “a world financial order” and force sovereign nations “to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action,” that is to say through world government and a New World Order, a phrase Kissinger repeats several times in the article.

“An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into being. It will fragment disastrously if the various priorities cannot be reconciled,” writes Kissinger. In other words, if nations do not embrace the “international order” in response to the bankster engineered global depression, they will be left to twist in the wind, sort of like Zimbabwe and other third world nations where absolute poverty and human misery are the rule of the day.

“The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made globally accessible via instantaneous communication. The alternative to a new international order is chaos,” Kissinger warns.

Obama the manufactured messiah out of nowhere, Kissinger writes, is the answer. “The extraordinary impact of the president-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order.”  

Obama was selected by the global elite Kissinger so faithfully serves to push the New World Order scheme, misleadingly defined by Kissinger as “an opportunity, not a policy.” Kissinger’s primary goal is to shill for world government. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. In the late 1920’s, financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation.

“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” explained Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member. “A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.”

Kissinger is merely informing us of the plan his masters have had in mind now for more than sixty years. Obama will be the front man the globalists will use to usher in the New World Order, a phrase coined by H.G. Wells when he used it as the title of a book about a socialist one-world government future. “The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used it in a 1989 speech,” writes Drew Zahn. “Kissinger’s ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what ‘new world order’ might actually mean.”

Prior to his International Herald Tribune article, Kissinger mounted the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett that in essence Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid. Obama’s “task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”

In fact, it is a classic example of the problem-reaction-solution paradigm. The banksters engineered the current economic “problem” specifically to shove their “solution” down our throats — a New World Order of total control and global totalitarianism.

Baby Boomers “Born Into a Fascist Culture”

Real Letter From CEO To His Employees

This is a legitimate letter — the company actually exists.
1-7-9

To All My Valued Employees, There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn’t pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job however, is the changing political landscape in this country. Of course, as your employer, I am forbidden to tell you whom to vote for — it is against the law to discriminate based on political affiliation, Race, creed, religion, etc. Please vote who you think will serve your Interests the best. However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interest. First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner there is a back story. This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Mercedes outside. You’ve seen my big home at last years Christmas party. I’m sure all these flashy icons of luxury conjure up some idealized thoughts about my life. However, what you don’t see is the back story. I started this company 12 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 300 square foot studio apartment for 3 years. My entire living space was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you. My diet consisted of Ramen Pride noodles because every dollar I spent went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a defective transmission. I didn’t have time to date. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business — hard work, discipline, and sacrifice. Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a modest $50K a year and spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the Nordstrom’s for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the Goodwill store extracting any clothing item that didn’t look like it was birthed in the 70’s. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had. So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9am, mentally check in at about noon, and then leave at 5pm, I don’t. There is no “off” button For me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat, ****, and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to me like a 1 day old baby. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden — the nice house, the Mercedes, the vacations… You never realize the back story and the sacrifices I’ve made. Now, the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn’t. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed a decade of my life for. Yes, business ownership has is benefits but the price I’ve paid is steep and not without wounds. Unfortunately, the cost of running this business, and employing you, is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why: I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don’t pay enough. I have state taxes. Federal taxes. Property taxes. Sales and use taxes. Payroll taxes. Workers compensation taxes. Unemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a tax man to manage all these taxes and then guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him. Government mandates and regulations and all the accounting that goes with it, now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a check to the US Treasury for $288,000 for quarterly taxes. You know what my “stimulus” check was? Zero. Nada. Zilch. The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or, the single mother sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare check? Obviously, government feels the latter is the economic stimulus of this country. The fact is, if I deducted (Read: Stole) 50% of your paycheck you’d quit and you wouldn’t work here. I mean, why should you? That’s nuts. Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree which is why your job is in jeopardy. Here is what many of you don’t understand; to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had suddenly government mandated to me that I didn’t need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000 into the Washington black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees, and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now. When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don’t defibrillate and shock his thumb thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or, do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it. Suddenly, the power brokers in Washington believe the mud of America are the essential drivers of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change you can keep. So where am I going with all this? It’s quite simple. If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I fire you. I fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your SUV, and your child’s future. Frankly, it isn’t my problem any more. Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I’m done. I’m done with a country that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, will be my citizenship. While tax cuts to 95% of America sounds great on paper, don’t forget the backstory: If there is no job, there is no income to tax. A tax cut on zero dollars is zero. So, when you make decision to vote, ask yourself, who understands the economics of business ownership and who doesn’t? Whose policies will endanger your job? Answer those questions and you should know who might be the one capable of saving your job. While the media wants to tell you “It’s the economy Stupid” I’m telling you it isn’t. If you lose your job, it won’t be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country, steamrolled the Constitution, and will have changed its landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me in South Caribbean sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about. Signed, Your boss, Michael A. Crowley, PE Crowley, Crisp & Associates, Inc. Professional Engineers 1 906 South Main Street, Suite 122 Wake Forest, NC 27587

The Gaza Slaughter Is Premeditated Genocide

By Karl Schwarz
1-7-9

 

It is time to call a spade a spade. Israel is a nation of terrorists. The US has become a nation of terrorists.   For those readers who do not know what ‘anti-Semitism’ looks and smells like, they should pay close attention to the Israeli butchery in Gaza.   Since 9-11, and even before then through the auspices of US, UK, NATO sponsored terrorism in Operation Gladio, the US, UK and Israel have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the world’s preeminent terrorists are those three nations.   I see the constant brainwashing mantra of “terror” spewing out of the criminals in DC and from the MSM, knowing full well that my nation is, directly or indirectly, now the leading cause and support mechanism of global terrorism.   The slaughter of 1.5 million Iraqis was terrorism. The annihilation of 2-3 million Afghanis is terrorism. This latest Israeli massacre in Palestine with US weapons and support is terrorism.   Turn back the clock to August, 2008 and we have the US-Israel sponsored and condoned genocide of the citizens of South Ossetia. Mick ‘The Tie Eater” Saakashvili has now admitted that Georgia attacked first and Russia responded in force.   Go back a little further to 2006, and there is the Israeli attack on Lebanon, fully-armed with American weapons. The US and Israel clearly think there is no accountability for butchery and human sacrifice.   This is an action-reaction universe and for any action there is and will always be an reaction in reverse. Especially, when the initial action is pure evil.   I have been watching this ‘Hamas fires rockets at poor little Israel’ vomit and there many grievous things wrong with Israel’s whining and victimhood.   I have seen bigger and more deadly fireworks displays in the US and EU. These Hamas pipe bomb rockets are essentially toys to shout out the disgust Palestinians feel for their hostile, hateful neighbors in Zionist Israel.   News has now surfaced that this ‘defensive attack’ by Israel was in planning up to 18 months ago, just like the post 9-11 attack on Afghanistan. This is not self-defense; it is willful genocide of Palestinians. It is an unarguable fact that the Jews themselves refuse to make peace with the Palestinians they hold hostage in the world’s largest outdoor prison.   The Israelis have intentionally, willfully turned the lives of the Palestinians into a living Hell…or death…for DECADES. Every basic human necessity is denied by the Zionist Jew jailers in Tel Aviv who demand that everything has to be the Zionist Jew way…and to Hell with fairness, equity or humanity. It is sheer elitist, evil Talmudism.   Never have I seen such a psychotic, racist, bigoted little state pretend that they have some moral high ground yet prove time and time again that they are nothing less than thugs, gangsters and killers. I have been watching closely for over 30 years and it is apparent to me that Israel does not want peace. Period. It wants the Palestinians to go away and DIE.   What is one Israeli life worth? Is it ten dead Palestinians, or 100 dead women, children and complete annihilation of families? One ‘great’ Israeli statesman said, and I paraphrase, “All the Arabs in the world aren’t worth one Jewish fingernail.”   The Viasat History channel ran a special over the holidays about how the 20th Century was the bloodiest in recorded history of mankind. One part of that special was particularly disgusting as the narrator and story producers attempted to completely re-write history as to what World War I and World War II were all about.   I about gagged when they addressed the post-World War II matter of Israel. This is a quote from that special: “Following the Holocaust in Europe many of the Biblical Jews longed to return to their home in Israel. After all had suffered so much from World War II no one had enough energy left to object to their wishes.”   Folks, that is unadulterated total HORSESHIT. First, there was no “Israel” to return home to. It was Judea, remember? It was Palestine for about close to 2,000 years and the Jews and Arabs who lived there did so in peace. Most of them had never lived in ‘Israel’ and most of them did not return there as the great Exodus it was billed to be.   This is the same Holocaust crowd that does not want to openly discuss or research their claim of 6 million dead. No, they want the world to accept that as Gospel. Nor do they wish to discuss historical records that indicate that there were more Jews in Europe after World War II than preceding World War II, or that Zionist Jews financed the very Nazi Germany that supposedly sought to exterminate the Jews from Europe. They get very upset when someone brings up the fact that around 150,000 Jews served, often with great bravery and distinction, in the German military in World War II.   This is basically the same bunch that whips out the ‘anti-Semite’ label even though they are as far from being genuine Semitic people as are most of the people on the planet. The Khazar Zionist Jews are NOT SEMITIC, nor did they even come from that part of the world.   ‘Semite’ is not a race, it is a language group that includes the original Jews of Judea, many of the Arabs of that immediate area and even some of the original Ethiopians. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languages   Did you read that link? There are over 450 million Semitic language speaking people and the largest group is THE ARABS.   It therefore suggests that the most ANTI-SEMTIC people on the face of this planet are the white-skinned Khazar Zionist Jews and their White Cracker supremacists who control the UK and US governments.   It was not until the UN, the US, the UK, and the Zionist Rothschild family and their henchmen forced Israel upon the world that there was any problem whatsoever in that part of the world.   Most of these ‘Biblical Jews’ that longed for their homeland were not Jews by birth. They were from Khazaria which was in the Caspian Sea area far from Europe and far from Israel too. Since they had never lived in Israel it is sort of hard to long for a homeland that not only never existed, but that they never lived in…nor did any of their forefathers. They were not born of the 12 Tribes of Israel, they just decided to call themselves Jews about 740 AD, choosing that religion over Islam and Christianity.   These same Khazars then fled into Russia, Poland, Hungary and other areas to avoid meeting their doom when Genghis Khan shredded their Khazarian Empire. If you missed my past article ‘Long Live the Khazaria Empire, Not!’ it is posted on Rense at this link.   http://www.rense.com/general83/khaz.htm   Many years ago, I heard that Zionist Jews do not like actress Kelly McGinnis. She has starred in some memorable movies such as Top Gun, Witness, etc. I was curious as to why but did not know until recently. Kelly, it seems, starred in a 1988 movie titled “The House on Carroll Street”.   http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3181812736/tt0095333   What the movie was about is how our US government snuck Nazis into the US and hid them behind the names of dead people, many of them Jews living in the US who had died of natural causes in the early 1950s.   The deceit from Washington, DC never ends.   I suspect part of the reason Israel refuses to permit the duly, legally elected Hamas government to rule is that it will not move   inland to the Palestinian Ghettos and let the greedy Jew real estate developers have that choice beach front Mediterranean property. And then there is the quiet story of the substantial amounts of oil and natural gas in and offshore of Gaza.   The former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had to resign in disgrace due to a real estate scam, bribery, and scandals involving his buddies. My shit detector says that Zionist Jews want the Gaza Strip and that prime Mediterranean beach property for more Zionist Israel settlements. And perhaps a Las Vegas style ‘entertainment’ and gambling, prostitution, drugs, money laundering mecca.   I bet Bernie Madoff has already purchased a nice flat there with a great ocean view. Current news says Bernie has already violated his parole by trying to hide jewelry and other assets from prosecutors. Now, finally, they are insisting that he be held without bond. Don’t hold your breath.   This is, indeed, the latest in a long series of massacre/holocausts of Palestinian ‘Semite’ Arabs and Christian ‘Semite’ Arabs, etc, perpetrated, as always, by Zionist Khazar Jews who own and operate the House of Rothschild’s ’shitty little country’ (as top French Government official said a few years ago).   It is time for the good people of this world, this entire sorry planet, to stand up to the US, the UK and Zionist Israel and say ‘NEVER AGAIN!’   Karl kwschwarz@chello.sk Karl’s Datapage Archive