Tag Archives: fraud
Where are all the “liberal” voices against the new war in Libya? I often go to the huffingtonpost.com to see what the trendy progressives think of current events. After wading through the disgusting fluff about the latest celebrity “baby bump” or who is “stepping out” with their significant other, you will find links to corporate news stories dealing with world issues. Real dissent is not found on AOL/huffingtonpost. You will only get the company line, or some small variation there of. The comment sections on these stories are so disgraceful that it makes the Fox news audience look enlightened. There is one intellectual comment for every hundred hypocritical pro-war rants. “Gaddafi is a brutal dictator who must be stopped from killing the freedom-loving rebels.” “The brave rebels need our support.” Recently, Gaddafi asked what Obama would do if rebels attacked an American city. First off, Obama wouldn’t do anything. He makes no decisions for himself. He is a sock puppet who has such a sordid past that he would never step out of line, for fear of being exposed as the fraud that he really is. To answer Gaddafi’s question, the powers that be would probably light off a neutron bomb on the rebels and then use the media to blame it on the terrifying Osama bin Laden and the omnipotent Al Qaeda (correctly pronounced Al- CIA duh).
How many times will these enlightened, progressive voices use mental gymnastics to call for democracy to be delivered from fighter jets? The vast majority of Americans will believe the media’s spin on the “new Hitler” every time. Most probably lack the ability to understand that about 6 billion or so people see the U.S. and the western world as the new Nazis. Whatever that means. – Editor
Confidential Palestinian documents leaked to Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based television network, suggest that Mr Obama retreated from a promise that territory occupied by Israel after the Six Day War of 1967 should become the basis for a future Palestinian state.
The documents, part of a second tranche of the “Palestine Papers” released by Al Jazeera on Monday evening, indicate that Mr Obama’s change of heart was the result of Israeli pressure.
The English royal family makes me sick. How could anyone believe that these inbred degenerates were chosen by God to rule over others? They have spent decades and probably millions of dollars convincing the world that they are nothing more than kindly figure-heads! The reality is, however, that the Queen is the largest landholder in the world. In fact, it is said that the British crown still owns the entirety of its former empire. In places like Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, everything below the top 6 inches of soil belongs to the Queen! It’s time that all of humanity realized that it is not our shared destiny to be lorded over by satanic, psychopathic bloodlines. The picture below demonstrates that some people are starting to resent financing other people’s decadence. I would be nervous if I were in their shoes too. -editor
Cloak of secrecy: Letters, emails and documents relating to the Royals can no longer be disclosed
The Royals are to be shrouded in a thicker cloak of secrecy because of a controversial change in the law which will protect them from public scrutiny.
Letters, emails and documents relating to the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William can no longer be disclosed – even if they might be in the public interest.
The changes, which are part of a series of reforms to the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, will mean an end to journalists investigating the family’s finances.
The move calls into question Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg’s comments this week which stated it was a ‘fundamental right’ of all citizens to be able to hold their government to account.
He outlined a plan to extend the FOI Act to hundreds more taxpayer-funded bodies, opening up to greater scrutiny by the public.
But he did not mention the clause restricting information about the Royals.
Since the legislation was first introduced in 2000, the affairs of the Royals have been more transparent – with the family forced to admit in September that the Queen tried to use a state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace.
The law has also been used to push for the disclosure of the Prince of Wales’ many written discussions with MPs.
Buckingham Palace has said it consulted with the Government over the new ‘added protection’ for the Royal family.
It was hidden in the small print of proposals called ‘opening up public bodies to public scrutiny.’
It read: ‘Communications with the Monarch, the Heir to the Throne and second in line to the Throne will be subject to an absolute exemption, and the rest will remain qualified.
‘The lifespan of the exemption will change from 30 years to 20 years, or five years after the death of the relevant member of the Royal Family, whichever is later.’
Representatives from the Campaign for Freedom of Information have said the change could have wider implications, with royal park keepers and other workers also potentially exempt.
Later this month, Cabinet Office lawyers will go to court to resist FOI requests to publish letters written to ministers by the Prince of Wales.
A Buckingham Palace spokesman said the law change was necessary to protect the constitutional position of the monarch and her heirs, who had the right to confidential consultation with the Government.
(Everyone check out henrymakow.com for very interesting articles on a wide range of subjects. If anyone is looking to start writing their own articles, Dr. Makow is very willing to run reader submitted articles!)
December 27, 2010
Civilized sexual behavior is based on upholding marriage and motherhood. Only then are promiscuity prevented and females valued for their character and ability. Now they’re like cheap whores holding numbers in a Bangkok brothel.”
“We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order.” Protocols of Zion, 16
by Henry Makow, Ph.D.
(From August 11, Revised Dec. 26)
While the feminist mothers saw power as financial independence and rejected female “objectification,” their daughters accept the pornographic message of pop music and advertising. In the words of one mom, they “believe their purpose in life is to be sexual beings who please men.”
“A blow job is like shaking hands,” said another mom. “Their attitude is: ‘We’re emancipated, we’re liberated, we’re in control. They see [it] as power; I see it as giving their power away.”
Indeed it is. But: Who taught they could have sex outside of courtship, love and marriage? Who tarred the roles of wife and mother? Who tore down men i.e.”the patriarchy” ?
Feminists did. An essentially lesbian disorder, feminism brainwashed young women to see husbands as oppressors and family as bondage. There was no longer any reason to restrict sex to love and marriage.
“Women’s rights” indeed! Feminism is Communist in origin. Communists view women as a public utility. It is classic divide-and-conquer, satanic subterfuge which now extends far beyond gender.
Civilized sexual behavior is based on upholding marriage and motherhood. Only then are promiscuity prevented and females valued for their character and ability. Now they’re like cheap whores holding numbers in a Bangkok brothel.
Understandably, feminists won’t admit they’ve been cynically betrayed by their teachers and political leaders. Feminism was created by elite social engineers to reduce population and undermine marriage and family.
FEMINISTS IN DENIAL
Even while wringing their hands, feminists are blinded by their ideology. (The article veers off into a discussion of how feminism is still relevant.)
The words “love,” “marriage,” “husband” and “family” do not appear in the article. No wonder they can’t understand the problem and what to do about it.
In the past, men had to commit before they could have sex. As a result, women were cherished for themselves and given a lifelong role that satisfied their deepest emotional needs.
Both mothers and daughters are victims of deliberate social subversion. A woman’s career used to be wife and mother. She consecrated her sexuality for the man she loved, the father of her children, her protector and provider.
Young women today are up a creek. They are going to be left high and dry. Even if they land a man, they’ve lost the ability to love him.
Marriage and motherhood is a woman’s biological and social destiny. It ensures she is needed, loved and secure long after her sex appeal has faded. It’s mind blowing that young women are so heedless of their own self-interest.
Young women obsess on beauty but true beauty comes from within, from a spiritual purity. This means rejecting all coarse influences and behavior. It means focusing on the qualities that make for a good person, wife and mother.
“I don’t meet many girls who feel good about themselves, even though they are totally gorgeous,” one social worker says.
How could they … giving their bodies to strangers who dump them?
Girls figure they have to or boys will get it from other girls. That’s like saying, “if I don’t let muggers beat me, other girls will.”
Apparently the saying is true: “Woman’s virtue is man’s greatest invention.”
“Father” is another word totally absent from the article. Girls could get love, self respect and guidance from their fathers. But their feminist mothers probably drove their fathers away.
It’s not too late for girls to become women again. There can be no sex without courtship and love. If other girls give it away, let them suffer the consequences.
Girls can become feminine again by making marriage and family their first priority. If they refocus on being attractive to the right man, they can regain the path to fulfillment and happiness.